This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
food and
drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review
WP:Trivia and
WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,
select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Who wrote this article, it's really lousy, some errors I removed were that
indian runners are the best layers,
peking ducks are the most commonly raised (peking duck isn't even a breed, it's a dish, sort of like saying raisin bread is the most common type of grape grown). 10:42, 8 August 2006
User:209.124.131.151
Why is there no article for Duck a L'orange? I thought it was a fairly important dish. ( 20:15, 23 July 2009 (UTC)) —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Omicron91 (
talk •
contribs)
Edible Fats and Oils?
This page is part of the "edible fats and oils" series. The thingy is at the bottom, and has a link here, but there is not actually a section on Duck Fat as is suggested by the link. Either this should be added, or it should be removed from this series (I'm not a regular wikipedian, so I don't know if I'm using the right vocabulary here. Sorry in advance) —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
35.10.217.86 (
talk)
12:05, 12 October 2009 (UTC)reply
(Moved thread to bottom per convention)
Duck fat redirects here. I think there should definitely be a section discussing the use of rendered duck fat; it's sold as a gourmet item, and I know that it is a very popular cooking fat in french cuisine. I would've just added the section, but I hope to do some research and find some decent sources to back up my info. I'm sure most french cookbooks with a glossary will discuss it. -
Verdatum (
talk)
17:55, 12 October 2009 (UTC)reply
Add information on duck contamination as a human food
I would like to add content about ducks' relation to pollution in water, such as river. Ducks eat fish, and fish can pick up contamination, especially fat-soluble poisons like
PCBs, and the pollution gets bio-magnified up the food chain. In rivers like the
Housatonic River that have been polluted by
PCBs, it can be dangerous for humans to eat ducks because they can be very high in the poison. It can be harmful and cause sickness or death. Some hunters know about this, but many do not. I think it would be useful as (1) good content and also (2) important knowledge for public safety. It could even result in saving lives. Thoughts?
SageRad (
talk)
00:38, 21 October 2015 (UTC)reply
I appreciate the
to follow the source more closely, although i would add that i personally do know that toxicity can be greater than that which is reported in the source, and also depends of course on the levels of PCBs in the duck, which can be very high in some specific locales. The important thing is that the mention is present, so hunters and those eating wild duck know that there exists a risk.
SageRad (
talk)
06:59, 23 October 2015 (UTC)reply
The ref supporting the claim that ducks may contain PCBs is over 40 years old! Anywhere with significant PCBs in the rivers has a serious pollution problem which will affect many more things than ducks. The claim needs a better supporting ref or it should be removed. --
Ef80 (
talk)
16:30, 27 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Requested move 14 June 2016
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved as proposed, as there's consensus that "X as food" is better than "X (food)."
No such user asked a reasonable question about whether a couple of these should be in the plural, so I'm closing this without prejudice against separate RM(s) to settle that question (settling that here might get messy). --
Tavix(
talk)22:30, 21 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Support. The current titles imply two wholly different items of the same name (like
brain and
Brain [comics] or
switch and
switch [corporal punishment]). However, in the cases listed here, the articles are subtopics of the main articles on the respective animals which are not typically disambiguated with parentheticals at Wikipedia. —
AjaxSmack02:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Support, of course, the difference between what a duck eats and what eats ducks is obvious. Bat as food? That's a page I have to read, I wonder if
Semi-vegetarian's have added that page yet.
Randy Kryn11:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)reply
That's actually quite a reasonable point. Although duck is used for food for other animals (e.g. duck is used in domestic cat food), I doubt very much that is what the average reader will be looking for. DrChrissy(talk)19:52, 17 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.