This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Native Americans,
Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related
indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Colonial implies at some level being under the power of a foriegn authorit. Draggin Canoe never recognied auhority beyond the Cherokees. He should not be classed as colonial.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 22:51, 17 November 2012 (UTC)reply
Comment the outcome of this discussion is totally different then the outcome of the issue at CfD. No matter how you name it it is still imposing imperialism on people who were not part of the empire.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 01:41, 23 November 2012 (UTC)reply
Chickamauga
The Chickamauga nation is not Cherokee. George Washington 4th address states this. The split took place over the main body of the Cherokee nation wanted to sell to settlers. The Chickamauga didn't. We never rejoined the Cherokee nation. AYA TSIGAMOGI.
Mikebull1129 (
talk) 19:03, 15 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Hi Mike. As discussed in the
Chickamauga Cherokee article, the Chickamauga were originally Cherokee but split from the Cherokee nation. However, they are still referred to by
reliable sources as Cherokee, so that's what Wikipedia must follow. Cheers, Λυδαcιτγ 01:21, 16 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Chickamauga.
How much more of a reliable source is there than a chickamauga? We have even proven this fact to the state of tennessee and have had tennessee blue book history changed because of it.
Mikebull1129 (
talk) 16:06, 24 August 2018 (UTC)reply