This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Edinburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Edinburgh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EdinburghWikipedia:WikiProject EdinburghTemplate:WikiProject EdinburghEdinburgh articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Scotland and
Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
This is the basic outline of what needs to be done.
Early encounters text needs to be substantiated with references; I adapted much of the text from
John French, 1st Earl of Ypres.
Early Encounters
Tensions quickly arose between Haig and French. Haig and Lord Kitchener, who was now
Secretary of State for War, clashed with French over the positioning of the BEF. French argued to the
war council) that it should be positioned in
Belgium, where he had confidence in the country's many fortresses, while Haig and Kitchener proposed that the BEF would be better positioned to counter-attack in
Amiens, stating that the BEF would have to abandon its positions in Belgium once the poorly-equipped
Belgian Army collapsed, forcing the BEF into retreat with the loss of much of its supplies. During an inspection of Aldershot, Haig told King George V that he had "grave doubts" about French's competence.
I have
removed the image of a Serbian medal ribbon which was wrongly being used to illustrate a Montenegrin medal. I don't think we have a ribbon for the Montenegrin
Obilić Medal.
DuncanHill (
talk) 02:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Reputation article split
Splitting sections on reputation to the article
Draft:Reputation of Douglas Haig and then moving it to the main space. It looks like the article meets the criteria for splitting, and another article in the draft space seems to have expanded on this section. It already is over the recommended
Wikipedia:Splitting size limit, and says the splitting is very likely needed at the current article length.
aaronneallucas (
talk) 20:25, 9 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Long story, appropriately enough for a long article. I was working on Haig back in 2011-12, over a decade ago now. There is a lot to be said about him, and the article had already become extremely long, so I hived off 1918 and his "reputation" into sub-articles and put them up for creation, which in those days had to be approved by a member of God's Elect - only for them to be rejected out of hand for reasons which didn't seem to to amount to much more than "nah, I don't like". It is much more common nowadays than it was then for major figures, eg. US Presidents, to have entire families of articles devoted to them. However, I was very cross about this and walked away - which is why the article, which seems to have changed surprisingly little since I last looked in on it, contains so little on the Somme, Nivelle/Arras and Passchendaele. Since then somebody found and created the 1918 draft and I did some more work on it - it is quite detailed up to the summer of 1918 and relying on non-Haig-iographic sources, but needs more work done on the Hundred Days in the autumn. However, I wasn't planning on doing any more work on Haig any time soon - there are just other articles which I'd rather be writing.
To be honest I was going to give the "Reputation" article a quick smarten up and copyedit and then "be bold" and move it to mainspace myself. I've lately read Heathorn's book on the evolving reputations of Kitchener and Haig, and Dan Todman's "Great War in Myth and Memory", both of which have some fresh material which can be incorporated when I can find time. It was more or less presentable eleven years ago and there is certainly enough there for a separate article.
The article relies heavily on the 1988 (de) Groot biog as it is a scholarly but critical biog, so I chose it as the initial "skeleton" out of the available biographies. In time all the other biographies will need to be incorporated, and a load of other books as well. There are other sub articles on 1914-15, 1916 and 1917 kicking around in draftspace. The first two are vaguely presentable as far as they go - the 1917 one needs some work before it can be posted live. In time we can have an extra article on his early life - there is a fair bit more material to be had from Badsey on cavalry which I've also read recently, and that "Futile Exercises" book on pre-war BEF training.
For those who aren't aware the biogs of Sir John French, Wully Robertson, Henry Wilson, Hubert Gough (and Haking and Hunter-Weston) are almost entirely written by me. So that's what I'm capable of writing, given time.
Paulturtle (
talk) 23:03, 9 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Might be worth changing the title to Douglas Haig: Reputation so that it comes up when people type "Haig" into the search engine. It's probably the stuff most people want to read about Haig.
Paulturtle (
talk) 03:32, 10 May 2023 (UTC)reply
No, I think that would go way against naming conventions for article titles.
aaronneallucas (
talk) 05:12, 10 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Somebody has made the article live. Will copyedit it and then slim down the relevant bits in this article, being careful not to lose anything.
Paulturtle (
talk) 04:34, 19 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Too long?
An editor has tagged the page as "too long to read and navigate comfortable". I am removing the tag as I think, in this case, the length is not unreasonable and fragmenting the flow of the article would be unhelpful. I happy to consider proposals from a willing editor as to how they propose to spilt it.
Dormskirk (
talk) 09:38, 26 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Unfortunately at over 19k words of readable prose, the length is entirely unreasonable - see
WP:SIZE and
WP:SUMMARY. The article would benefit from significant summarization to make it more accessible to the general readership.
Nikkimaria (
talk) 14:49, 26 December 2023 (UTC)reply
As already indicated above, I disagree. Are you prepared to do the work to condense it? If not this seems to be a case of
WP:DRIVEBY and the tag should not be readded.
Dormskirk (
talk) 15:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Yes, I am absolutely willing to work on it.
Nikkimaria (
talk) 15:23, 26 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Great. In which case that's fine. Please go-ahead. Many thanks,
Dormskirk (
talk) 15:26, 26 December 2023 (UTC)reply
By the way, as explained above,
Paulturtle is already working on a proposed split on this one.
Dormskirk (
talk) 15:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC)reply