Doki Doki Literature Club! has been listed as one of the
Video games good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 3, 2019. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Doki Doki Literature Club! article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Doki Doki Literature Club!" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
A fact from Doki Doki Literature Club! appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 3 May 2019 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article contains a translation of Doki Doki Literature Club! from ru.wikipedia. ( 890236674 et seq.) |
The "development and release" section currently says:
Paying US$10 or more unlocks a bonus "Fan Pack" that includes desktop and mobile wallpapers, the game's official soundtrack, and a digital concept art booklet.
While true, I think mentioning the price is not what Wikipedia is about. I tried rewording it, but it was not expressed well enough by me:
I can agree with the revert reason. I'm not good at fixing it with a better description however, so may another editor look into this please? Pinging @ CurlyWii. 84.250.17.211 ( talk) 20:46, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The plot section delves quite headfirst into the full of the game,which can definitely shy away a few people interested in the game who wanted to view the Wikipedia page before downloading it.Should the plot section be edited to be spoiler-free or do you think it's on the blame of the reader for reading the plot section for a plot-heavy VN? — Preceding unsigned comment added by QKpzw ( talk • contribs) 08:34, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
The article is currently a lot of text without many images to illustrate things, especially the Plot section, any specific ideas on what to add, if anything? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AntiGravityMaster ( talk • contribs) 18:30, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Recently an editor to this article added a paragraph to the Reception section showing two very polarizing and very negative reviews. I removed this section entirely due to it coming from two essentially unheard of sources and talking of a seemingly large amount of people who hate the game while only citing two sources (the paragraph was also somewhat messy and extensive). I suppose this could be added back in some way, although I'm not in favor of that. I think it's redundant to include the one or two people obscure publications who hate on something everyone else loves that will always be there no matter what. This is clearly an unpopular opinion, so until a major publication shares this "popular" opinion, I'm not in favor of adding it back. Thoughts? AntiGravityMaster ( talk) 02:00, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Include description on fan-made mods such as http://www.monikaafterstory.com/ and justmonika.wixsite.com/justmonika Onceanidiot ( talk) 15:13, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Reversion. I am unsure as to why the Daily Mail is an unsuitable reference here. Axl ¤ [Talk] 15:35, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Britton, Paul; Yarwood, Sam (June 26, 2018). "A 15-year-old boy was found dead. Now his dad, and a coroner, have warned about the 'horror' online game he was playing". Manchester Evening News. Retrieved June 28, 2018.
The article states; "He said the game was linked with his mobile phone and would be contacted by text message during the day and at night, often waking him up."
This is impossible to be associated with this game.
Shouldn't a note be added for this?
The game is also not an "online" game, though that can be ignored as semantics.
Or, better yet, we just remove it entirely to avoid any confusion at all. In fact, it's not even been confirmed that any game has been directly linked to his suicide, there're are many other factors than just what game he had played. I say that we keep this out the wiki page until it has been confirmed 100% that this was a major role in his suicide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arminkaric ( talk • contribs) 02:25, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
When it is in the possible endings change the "if monika's file is prematurely deleted." if ANY Character is deleted Skrrito ( talk) 11:08, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change: "there is no happiness" in it. to "no happiness can be found" in it. An error message then pops up informing the player that a script file is missing or corrupt and that the game needs to be reinstalled. Without reinstalling the game it will keep prompting the player to reinstall.
The "no happiness can be found" in it is the specific way it is put in the letter and immediately after that is the error message. HoodedH ( talk) 04:58, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Should there be a list of characters in DDLC article? 184.155.146.26 ( talk) 01:51, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
So this news article popped up from Chicagoland: Gary middle school issues warning about popular online game. Should there be text added concerning that the game may cause suicidal tendencies? FunksBrother ( talk) 17:28, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Monika appears and apologizes to the protagonist for the "boring" weekend he had spent, and begins a display of compensation -- The word "compensation" makes no sense here. Should it be "compassion"? 109.246.123.214 ( talk) 16:33, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
ref: Kagefumi https://ddlcwiki.net/wiki/Kagefum
Initially handed assignment, personal reasons caused a replacement artist assigned.
https://doki-doki-literature-club.fandom.com/wiki/Satchely
https://www.deviantart.com/satchely/journal/Free-Game-Release-Doki-Doki-Literature-Club-705810669
106.71.241.36 ( talk) 02:44, 30 May 2019 (UTC) I never saved a password; in fact I'm not sure what screen name I used, maybe novista. I'm not game to mess with the article itself.TY. Update: now Xae-chan registered, before that did the edit request— Preceding unsigned comment added by Xae-chan ( talk • contribs) 01:39, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Appears that the artist data was changed on April 1 2019 [1]. Satchely is Credited as ″Character Art″ on both [2] and [3]. Velinquent is credited as background art in those same two sources. Request is to update "artist = Kagefumi, VelinquenT " to "artist = Satchely, VelinquenT " 2406:E006:400F:EE01:C8C5:2B03:8C7F:7B3F ( talk) 07:56, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
References
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The artist entry for Kagefumi is incorrect Satchel (on Twitter) was the final artist. When I discovered the entry, I messaged her and came to see what to do. Here is the source info: The Concept Art Booklet in DDLC Fan Pack After Dave, another amazing artist by the name of Kagefumi was briefly involved with development for a couple months. She helped further set the character designs in stone. She was originally going to illustrate the entire game, but unrelated personal difficulties resulted in her having to step down. The Final Sprites After Satchely came on board, the sprites progressed fairly quickly. I first had her sketch all the sprite poses so that I could finally update my in-game placeholders to something that would be closer to the final art. 106.71.241.36 ( talk) 01:08, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Lately Satchely’s artist credit has been repeatedly removed from the article, despite the fact that she is the one that drew the character sprites and other related art for the game. To reaffirm, Satchely and VelinquenT are the character and background artists for Doki Doki Literature Club. Kagefumi was originally going to be an artist for the game but dropped out early on due to problems, according to info in the official DDLC fan pack. I would like to ask why Satchely’s credit is being removed for seemingly no apparent reason. MaRoFu ( talk) 14:18, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Scrat987 ( talk) 12:48, 20 June 2019 (UTC) A sequel is now in development, Under the name Project Libitina.
I added a section towards the end which features the track listing, along with some information regarding the soundrack. VirreFriberg ( talk) 20:51, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
I see no reason why this shouldn't be included in this category. Similar to other "fad trending games" (FNAF, Among Us, Fall Guys etc), a lot of notable and popular YouTubers played DDLC (e.g. PewDiePie, Markiplier and Jacksepticeye). DDLC's popularity online was a trend. Yes, it still has a fanbase and active subreddit, but the FNAF fanbase is also still active (Dawko still mnakes FNAF content which gets hundreds of thousands of viewws), and yet that's still in the fads and trends category. DDLC's popularity when it was trending isn't any different, so it should remain in "2010s fads and trends".
I don't want to have an edit war though, so I thought I'd discuss this here instead. -- ThisIsSparta2007 ( talk) 12:39, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
According to those diffs, correction has been made but not finished. I mainly contribute to zh-cn so if anyone would like to finish this correction I would be greatful.
Source:
(Someone said that tweet isn't an authentic source so here you are)
”After Satchely came on board, the sprites progressed fairly quickly.“ [1]
EL File4138 ( talk) 02:35, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
References
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change "Salvato then handed visual development over to Kagefumi, who created the final versions of the characters, their sprites, and the background images over the course of a few months." to "Salvato then handed visual development over to Kagefumi, who created the initial versions of the characters, then subsequently to Satchel, who created the final editions of their sprites."
Source: Salvato, Dan (2017) Doki Doki Literature Club! Concept Art Booklet, p. 12 JasonDaemon24 ( talk) 04:41, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Monika has garnered a lot of attention from the fanbase, so can we create an article for her? Dangervest69 ( talk) 05:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Yes,there is a Doki Doki FNF mod,there is also a "VS Monika" mod,but there is a spoiler which features Jade senpai. 76.112.212.53 ( talk) 23:44, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
It seems odd that for a game that is intentionally trying to parody a visual novel, the screenshot shown doesn't give the game an accurate idea of how its played. Blue Pumpkin Pie ( talk) 06:32, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
I'm just gonna post something here to vent my frustration.
So, I wanted to add the " A little bit of Monika" meme from YouTube right? The meme was mostly only prevalent on YouTube so it's basically the only place I could have cited from. Nope, YouTube isn't a reliable source (even for meme for some reason). Fine I went looking and the only places I found outside of YouTube were:
Know Your Meme wasn't trustworthy because it was a user generated website?! Wha- WHAT?! Wikipedia is a user generated website what kind of hypocritical logic is this?!?!!?
I don't know why I'm getting so mad about this, it shouldn't matter yet I feel so F***ING mad about it! The Mining Pickaxe ( talk) 12:26, 4 April 2024 (UTC)