This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
cities,
towns and various other
settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Asian, African, and European influences continue to dominate the food scene in the region?
From the article: A large dam on the Dnieper river was completed in 1964 built by thousands of immigrant workers. Because of these workers, a restaurant culture unique in Ukraine has emerged. A variety of diverse Asian, African, and European influences continue to dominate the food scene in the region. Personally I don't believe that... anyone got any references? --
Mariah-Yulia (
talk) 22:07, 19 December 2008 (UTC)reply
This passage is someones's joke. The town is one of the typical post-Soviet industrial centers.
Ans-mo (
talk) 08:00, 20 December 2008 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Dniprodzerzhynsk. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page already moved by someone.
Anthony Appleyard (
talk) 22:19, 19 May 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 19 July 2016
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved.
Anthony Appleyard (
talk) 10:49, 28 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Dniprodzerzhynsk →
Kamianske – The city was renamed couple of months ago, and I do not see any evidence that there is a common English usage of its name per
WP:COMMON--
Ymblanter (
talk) 15:01, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Ymblanter (
talk) 15:01, 19 July 2016 (UTC)reply
I am well aware of these situation. However,
Dnipropetrovsk and
Kirovohrad (likely to be moved next week) are the regional centers, and there is certain chance they may have independent English usage. It was decided a long time ago that the names of Ukrainian localities just follow the official names, with exceptions being
Kiev,
Odessa, and
Chernobyl. Now, presumably,
Dnipropetrovsk qualifies as well, as well as localities in Crimea,
Donetsk People's Republic, and
Luhansk People's Republic (the Rada renamed some of these as well, though it is likely to have zero effect on the common usage). However, I can not imagine anybody resisting moving
Dniprodzerzhynsk. Recently, we had a large RM for obscure Ukrainian localities, see
Talk:Myrnohrad, which met no opposition.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 15:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Support. The city has no
WP:COMMONNAME in English: Ngrams are not available for
both Dniprodzerzhynsk and Kamianske, which means there is not enough sources about the city. Kamianske as the city's original name has few but rather good sources including
Encyclopedia of Ukraine and
Ukraine, a Concise Encyclopedia, or history books like on
WWII or
the Ukrainian famine.
Ukraine: Trip Five is a good example of how Dniprodzerzhynsk can be considered in English: author misspells it and qualifies as a tongue-twister for westerners. We can conclude that a) Kamianske is a modern name, while Dniprodzerzhynsk is a name used between 1936 and 2016, b) neither name is really common and/or recognizable in English, c) Kamianske is used in English-language sources. This means that
WP:MODERNPLACENAME should apply here and the article should be renamed —
NickK (
talk) 15:12, 22 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Support. English name should follow the official one.
Ales sandro (
talk) 18:27, 22 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Support. The place had no established English name (and never had) and no "footprint"in the English language. — Yulia Romero •
Talk to me! 18:07, 26 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Support – No discernable English usage, so the Ukrainian name takes precedence. —
JFGtalk 08:04, 28 July 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Kamianske. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
I have just modified 2 external links on
Kamianske. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Kamianske, Kamianske Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast →
Kamianske – Per
WP:PLACEDAB, if there are multiple settlements with the same name and there are no other names with which the city can be confused, the title should be just the city alone if it is the primary topic (see
WP:PTOPIC), as is the case for all Wikipedias except the English one. From
this list it appears that it is the most plausible target by a wide margin. (The city has 200K+ people, the next largest Kamianske, which is in the same oblast, is just a large village, and yet another one in the oblast is a small settlement).
WP:UAPLACE, which seems to be invoked for recent moves, appears not to take into account
WP:PTOPIC, and as an explanatory page, has less weight than the PTOPIC guideline. Szmenderowiecki (talk) 13:19, 28 October 2022 (UTC) (edited 15:07, 28 October 2022 (UTC)) Moving from RM/TR since this has moved a couple of times this year without RMs.
UtherSRG(talk) 14:55, 28 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment The talk header needs a summary of the previous RMs. Those discussions may need to be taken into account. -
UtherSRG(talk) 14:55, 28 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Support, clear primary topic.
eviolite(talk) 15:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.--
Ortizesp (
talk) 16:28, 28 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Support, Kamianske is a city which would be more relevant, while at its header there should be a disambiguation link.
Aleksandr Grigoryev (
talk) 23:24, 28 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.