This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cryptography: Computer science High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as High-importance).

We have a page for Existential forgery, but we combine universal and selective forgery into one article. Should we create 3 articles, or combine them here? I believe if we combine them, it will be easier to see the differences in the message descriptions. -- Chrismiceli ( talk) 20:10, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply

We should rename this article as it applies to digital signatures as well, perhaps Forgery (Cryptography) -- Chrismiceli ( talk) 21:02, 19 May 2009 (UTC) reply

The terms "strong" and "weak" unforgeablity show up in literature quite often. The relation between those terms and the three terms described in the article would make a nice addition 130.225.93.131 ( talk) 10:57, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Crypto student reply