This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article has been
automatically rated by a
bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Who?
ruthlessly hunting down the fugitive, and they kill the Tollmaster Who is this? It is the first mention of this name.
Maury Markowitz (
talk) 16:43, 31 March 2013 (UTC)reply
Within the context of the tollport, master of the tollport. Probably shouldn't be in capitalized though.
DonQuixote (
talk) 16:51, 31 March 2013 (UTC)reply
The Typo
Corrected the reference to it being fixed for the 1991 reprint. Nope, still there and still funny.
70.72.211.35 (
talk) 00:36, 7 June 2013 (UTC)reply
I have searched for hours to find a citation for this claim that isn't coming from a fan site, a blog or a wikia. Unfortunately I found no RS mentioning this typo, although I can attest to having read about it on fan sites. However, this being an encyclopedia, a fan site is not considered an RS source so I'm removing the (albeit interesting and amusing) claim. If someone can find an RS source for the claim, by all means add it back, along with the citation for the source. Kind regards,
Curdigirl (
talk) 03:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on
Delta and the Bannermen. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
Copy Editors Guild Backlog elimination drive March 2017
Hi there! This article was tagged for copy editing and was included in the March 2017 Copy Editors Guild Backlog elimination drive. I'm running through the article to give it a general once over for copy editing. I'll share any questions, comments or significant findings here.
Curdigirl (
talk) 01:00, 19 March 2017 (UTC)reply
I'm finding quite a bit of unsourced material which -may-be original research. As a Dr. Who fan, I'd like to keep as much material intact as possible so I'm attempting to verify the material. I have removed some non-neutral language which I couldn't verify in any of the sources that I provided. Of course, Tardis wiki has an absolute ton of source material but being a fan wiki, it is not an RS that could be used for this article. I'll circle back here with findings on any particular unverified information — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Curdigirl (
talk •
contribs) 02:31, 20 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Removed statements about the "famous typo" and Kate Orman + Navarinos. In both cases, despite seeing the statement on fan sites and self-published blogs, no RS/independent, non-self-published source could be found for either statement.
Curdigirl (
talk) 21:24, 25 March 2017 (UTC)reply