Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Hi there, having made a few cosmetic tweaks, I believe that this article passes GA without the need for further improvement—the following criteria are listed and checked just for the record.

• It is reasonably well written.

  a (prose): b ( MoS):

• It is factually accurate and verifiable.

  a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):

• It is broad in its coverage.

  a (major aspects): b (focused):

• It follows the neutral point of view policy.

  a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

• It is stable.

  

• It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

  a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

• Overall:

  a Pass/Fail:

Well done! Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 11:16, 21 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Thanks for taking the time to review the article Ian! Parsecboy ( talk) 12:21, 21 September 2009 (UTC) reply