This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
computers,
computing, and
information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about
electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the
project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles
An edit intended to make
Daala#History look less like
proseline was
reverted: "the history of codec is easier to overview in older version". Perhaps I'm not understanding the logic behind that essay. --
Damian Yerrick (
talk) 18:10, 30 November 2013 (UTC)reply
It was just a detailed list of blog posts on the Xiph.Org website anyway. Maybe it's nice to have those linked somewhere for further reading, but I don't think that the posting of a blog entry is a relevant step in the history of the format. I
replaced it with a summary.--
Flugaal (
talk) 12:32, 7 August 2015 (UTC)reply
"Will there be" somehow asks for a look into the crystal ball. The format is far from being finalized.--
Flugaal (
talk) 12:34, 7 August 2015 (UTC)reply
“On March 25, 2015, Daala was proposed to the IETF for their Internet Video Codec (NETVC) video standard.”
In fact, Daala is not proposed as a whole, only individual coding techniques are. There is a
comprehensive list of all official submissions that clearly shows that. Additionally,
none of the given references mentions the 25th of March,
in March there was merely a presentation on Daala given to the working group,
official submissions of Daala-related documents took place in June and July,
IETF does not “rubberstamp” (as they say) any one submitted format proposal, but instead freely develop something different out of the input they get.
I edited that sentence accordingly once again.--
Flugaal (
talk) 12:45, 7 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Daala was presented as a candidate at IETF 92 and there are now two references in support of that. --
GrandDrake (
talk) 03:09, 11 August 2015 (UTC)reply
I fail to see how those references support that.--
Flugaal (
talk) 07:29, 15 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The Daala presentation at IETF 92 would be one reference and the tom's hardware article that covers it would be the second reference. Also I have added a statement that refers to testing of tools from both Daala and Thor. --
GrandDrake (
talk) 02:30, 24 August 2015 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on
Daala. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.