This article was nominated for deletion on 30 September 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Cookson repeater article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cookson repeater. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 18:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi @ Andy Dingley:, a wikilink related to
is something of less important in the WP article. Instead of a red link about a new article to be created, we have an autoclosed link [[Michel Lorenzoni]] which redirects to the current WP article (Cookson repeater). At the current version, I don't think users will understand by that it will useful to create a new article named Michele Lorenzoni. But this is only my opinion. Micheledisaveriosp ( talk) 10:20, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
At the current version, I don't think users will understand by that it will useful to create a new article named Michele Lorenzoni.