This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Construction article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This
level-3 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
The addition of builder would be worth a thought under higher education. As in some countries Builder is no longer considered a tried. In Australia a builder now has two more years experience than a tradesperson and normally a certificate four or diploma in construction. Looks forward to your reply Sntmichael ( talk) 10:16, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bridgit (software) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 28#Bridgit (software) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:15, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 14:37, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi User:Dustfreeworld. You recently reverted a change I made to keep safety within a section about characteristics of of the construction industry. You assert "Safety is not a “characteristic” of the industry. It’s a big problem caused by and also affecting the construction industry."
Previous edits of the construction article have created a logical hierarchy of four main headings: History, Sectors, Processes, Scale and characteristics. The latter's subsections included Economic activity, Employment, Sustainability, and (until you removed it) Safety. I do not share your view that this should be added to a main section of its own. Indeed, arguably, (a lack of) sustainability is an even greater problem with causes by and impacts upon the construction sector. I think the change you made warrants further discussion here with other editors to establish a consensus for your move. You clearly have a strong interest in air and dust pollution-related matters, but, in my view, your focus on these areas is potentially skewing the construction article by making safety more prominent than other issues ( WP:Undue).
I propose to revert the change and invite you to discuss it here on the article Talk page. If there is a consensus for a separate section, all well and good, but if not, safety should remain within the Scale and characteristics section. Thank you for reading (I have also left a similar note on your User Talk page). Paul W ( talk) 18:00, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Adding information about recent trends, technological innovations, or significant events in the construction companies and industry that might be missing from the article. like https://www.intellectsoft.net/blog/8-emerging-construction-technology-trends/ Jhoncarll ( talk) 19:48, 16 November 2023 (UTC)