This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Comac C919 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 365 days
![]() |
![]() | A news item involving Comac C919 was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 6 May 2017. | ![]() |
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Does this plane have an ICAO type code yet? Like 738 for the Boeing 737-800 or DH8 for the deHaveiland Canada Dash 8 Hobbitschuster ( talk) 22:38, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
As of 31 August 2018, FlightGlobal recenses 305 orders
I have a problem understanding the verb "recenses" and I wonder if it is meant to be something different?
MarkofGiles ( talk) 22:34, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi all. I found the high capacity seating of the aircraft to be 190 from Simpleflying.com. Generally, I think some reportings from Simpleflying of questionable quality. I second source it from CGTN. My edit was reverted because it's considered an unreliable source. -- Now wiki ( talk) 21:53, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
[moved from User talk:Marc Lacoste, more relevant here]
Hi, I read your comment w/r/t your formatting reversion on the above-refrenced wiki page; seems fine to me. I added the row and column formatting on the delivery table to save myself some time in the future (had some spare time to figure out how to do the table formatting so I thought I'd add it now rather than having to figure it out again later when I'm more pressed for time). On the unreliability tags, my question is if "rzjets.net" and "planespotters.net" are generally considered to be unreliable, what is a better source; perhaps a better source should be cited for the C919 page.
Cheers, Spotty's Friend ( talk) 20:15, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
It’s first flight May 27th 2023, it flew from Shanghai to Beijing. Source from Flightradar24. 173.214.158.63 ( talk) 02:43, 28 May 2023 (UTC)