![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 15 August 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Colleen has done some modeling, lots of shopping and general chav stuff.
A large portion of the Early Life segment is directly copied from a Daily Mail article on Coleen and Rooney.
The correct spelling is Coleen, with one "l". This has been confirmed with Wayne Rooney's agent; and also see stories in the national press e.g. The Times [1]
I am making the changes in the copy, but can someone who knows how to do it please move the article? (unsigned but 14:41, 12 October 2005, 143.252.80.110)
Moved - using the 'move' tab at the top :) Stephenb ( Talk) 15:04, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
Should it be added that colleen is from a poor council estate and that she is regarded as a rich chav. Magnoliapaint 20:34, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
What's the point in having this entry in Wikipedia? She hasn't done anything that would deserve an inclusion in an encyclopedia. "Getting media attention" doesn't qualify for me. The very little real information in here could be included in Rooney's entry. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.178.29.66 ( talk) 09:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC).
I agree she is a waste of time, who know body gives a two damn about her. Get her out of here!!!!!!!!! Y2J RKO 15:55, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Agreed. She's a Non Notable, undeserving, nauseating gravy-training bimbette. Dainamo ( talk) 23:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
At the very bottom it says something about how she offers her first child as a prize for a Hello! Competition. Can someone explain this please? Why would anyone offer a child as a prize? Is it a genuine mistake or someone trying to be funny? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.5.198.65 ( talk) 19:00, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
"Coleen Mary McLoughlin was born to Tony, who was a bricklayer and ran a boxing club, and McLoughlin, who was a nursery nurse."
I've seen a few moves so I just wanted to start up a discussion about this. Right now, sources I'm seeing still have her as McLoughlin. If she starts getting referred to as Coleen Rooney primarily, then we'd want to switch, but I think it's not appropriate as of yet. [2] [3] [4] Thoughts? Vickser ( talk) 23:55, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Its her name tho, innit? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lilyfan87 ( talk • contribs) 22:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Please can we not add rumours that Rooney is pregnant until there is confirmation from the couple? There have been so many reports she is pregnant across the last few years that it's not worth adding anything until we know for sure. I've had to remove one sentence already. It was good faith and well written for the large part, but it can't really stay until there is a statement or other proof/confirmation. Sky83 ( talk) 14:31, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Im not sure of the chances of this article being deleted but I have to strongly agree with it not having the status of a wikipedia article. I've seen entrys based around websites that have more interest to people then this article and have been deleted. It's poorly-written probably simply copied from other sources. All this girl appears to of ever been is a trophy wife. Im sure there are other trophy wifes on wikipedia, perhaps ones with more properly sourced information. Woods01 ( talk) 02:46, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Rather than complain here, it would have made more sense simply to nominate it for deletion. It’s probably too late now, because the “Wagatha Christie” tempest in a teacup scandal has been extensively covered by gossipy British media. I’ve made a few attempts to improve the prose just a bit ago, but more work is needed. TheScotch ( talk) 01:17, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Coleen Rooney. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 09:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Coleen Rooney. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 09:26, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Coleen Rooney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please refer to her as Wagatha Christie in recognition of her achievements to journalism today. I suggest "Coleen Rooney aka Wagatha Christie" 46.193.227.33 ( talk) 14:28, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Obviously it is inappropriate to use the article to make jokes, but this story not being mentioned at all is a bit odd. It's had a lot of coverage, for instance https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/newsbeat-49985658 Wikiditm ( talk) 17:43, 10 October 2019 (UTC)