From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: LOVI33 ( talk · contribs) 02:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Because of your numerous amazing reviews of my articles, I will take this on. At first glance it looks good. LOVI 33 02:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC) reply

LOVI33 Thanks a lot, cannot wait to see your comments. -- K. Peake 08:43, 4 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Infobox and lead

  • Are you sure Gospel should be included as a genre since it specifically refers to it's chorus?
  • Shouldn't it be fine to include as a genre since not only is the chorus included more than once but it is not described as merely "influence" from, or "elements" of gospel? -- K. Peake 15:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • "songwriting credit was added" → "a songwriting credit was added"
  •  Done does that look fine? -- K. Peake 15:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Background and development

Composition and lyrics

  • Looks Good!

Release and promotion

  • Looks Good!

Critical reception

  • Looks Good!

Music video

  • "An accompanying music video was directed" → "An accompanying music video for "Closed on Sunday" was directed"
  • Shouldn't he be mentioned as "West" instead of "Kanye"?
  • See MOS:SAMESURNAME, or is this not following that MOS rule properly and should it be "Kanye West" instead? -- K. Peake 15:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Commercial performance

  • Looks Good!

In popular culture

  • Looks Good!

Credits and personnel

  • Looks Good!

Charts

  • Looks Good!

Notes

  • Looks Good!

References

  • Copyvio score looks good at 27.0%
  • There are a few unarchived citations, but the rest look good.

External links

  • Looks Good!

Final comments and verdict

  • As always, the article is really well written. I'm going to put it  On hold for now. Just a few small fixes, shouldn't take too long. LOVI 33 15:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • LOVI33 Thanks for the review and proper feedback, have made some comments to you regarding it though. -- K. Peake 15:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Kyle Peake, you had good reasons for not applying some of my suggestions so I'm going to  Pass it. Great Job! LOVI 33 16:10, 4 August 2020 (UTC) reply