This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the
project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
I am suggesting this article be moved for consistency sake with Chromium(II) fluoride and Chromium(IV) fluoride.
To start, I will initially ask for the opinion of @
Double sharp: on this issue; there isn't really that much that needs to be said here in my opinion. What do you think? I am not setting up a public review because I feel that is a small decision, I just don't want to make it alone. This same logic also applies to Chromium pentafluoride and chromium hexafluoride.
UtopianPoyzin (
talk) 02:40, 13 November 2018 (UTC)reply
I agree that this one should be
chromium(III) fluoride, as it is predominantly ionic. However,
WP:NCCHEM indicates that Stock nomenclature should not be used for compounds with a substantial degree of covalency. Hence I think CrF5 and the hypothetical CrF6 ought to be left where they are. BTW, CrF4 has a rather low melting point and perhaps ought to be titled
chromium tetrafluoride as well.
Double sharp (
talk) 03:19, 13 November 2018 (UTC)reply