This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
Finance and
Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
This article contains only one in-line citation which does not appear in the (non-existent) reference list. It is an interesting article, but the claims -- about Thales and Marx, for example -- should be substantiated.
Thales Cite
Hi,
In his Politics (Book 1, part XI, 1259a - Jowett translation, Internet Classics Archive), Aristotle relates the following anecdote:
"There is the anecdote of Thales the Milesian and his financial device, which involves a principle of universal application, but is attributed to him on account of his reputation for wisdom. He was reproached for his poverty, which was supposed to show that philosophy was of no use. According to the story, he knew by his skill in the stars while it was yet winter that there would be a great harvest of olives in the coming year; so, having a little money, he gave deposits for the use of all the olive-presses in Chios and Miletus, which he hired at a low price because no one bid against him. When the harvest-time came, and many were wanted all at once and of a sudden, he let them out at any rate which he pleased, and made a quantity of money. Thus he showed the world that philosophers can easily be rich if they like, but that their ambition is of another sort."
That doesn't mean that Thales coined, or even used, the term "chrematistics" - perhaps somebody should check the original greek?
I do not think we have a lot of text from Thales. It is unlikely that he can be said to have coined the word. Instead of leaving this eternally with "citation needed", I remove the sentence until somebody comes with a reference. --
Dominique Meeùs (
talk) 22:44, 12 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Requested move 14 November 2016
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose in general. If there is no plan on making a "Chrematistics in Eastern thought" or the like article, then there's no need to have that qualifier. Also, using "Western" in the title sounds a bit quaint, for all that this isn't a dealbreaker.
SnowFire (
talk) 07:53, 15 November 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.