This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Effective Altruism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relevant to
effective altruism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Effective AltruismWikipedia:WikiProject Effective AltruismTemplate:WikiProject Effective AltruismEffective Altruism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritualityWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritualityTemplate:WikiProject SpiritualitySpirituality articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.
Virtue?
I am against the propagandistic title of this article. Instead of the title 'Charity (virtue)', i would prefer 'Charity (practise)'.--
Daanschr11:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)reply
I think the article is about what was defined by Christianity to be one of the
virtues. In that context it seems correct, but I think "virtue" should be technically defined earlier. It is about the religious context, not the more general modern
Charitable organization, nor giving to them, except in context.
Notinasnaid11:32, 21 November 2006 (UTC)reply
The
seven virtues doesn't seem to include charity. Charity could be in the place of liberality (as opposed to Greed), but liberality refers to the article
liberalism and not to this article. For me this is highly controversial, since liberalism is a specific political ideology, i don't belong to.--
Daanschr12:16, 21 November 2006 (UTC)reply
I see that kindness (as opposed to envy) includes charity. I would propose that this article will change its contents to make it fit into the Roman Catholic Seven Virtues as part of the virtue of kindness. Strange is that liberality doesn't refer to 'Liberalism (virtue)' but to 'liberalism'.--
Daanschr12:21, 21 November 2006 (UTC)reply
And then what? Eliminate everything from the virtue category on the grounds that it's propaganda to call anything a virtue?
Yes, charity is one of the seven Christian virtues, the theological virtues to be precise, and listed as such in the article you link. It is certainly not classified as part of kindness.
As for "liberalism (virtue)" -- this once was "Charity" and someone decided to move it. Talk to that Wikipedian if you want them to be parallel.
Goldfritha00:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)reply
It appears that the seven virtues were not always the same. Charity is mentioned as opposed to greed (in the archives of december 2005) and opposed to envy (according to Dante,
see article). It would be good to mention the history of charity as a virtue in this article.--
Daanschr13:14, 22 November 2006 (UTC)reply
I think we have to make a decision about the fundamental nature of this article. If it is to refer to the Christian virtue of charity then a generic charity page ought to be created. May I suggest
Charity (practice)? There will also be the issue of overlap with
Caritas (one of the three theological virtues). If this page is not to be focused solely on the Christian conception of Charity, as I recommend, then we will need to modify it to include other points of view. For example in Islam charity is a personal religious obligation, not a mark of virtue. There are, of course, totally secular points to be made as well.
Stephen Kenny15:59, 7 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Charity is a virtue and a virtue, for a Christian, is an obligation. Who comes up with the the Seven Virtues interpreted as "contrary virtues to the deadly sins" I don't know. I can't remember to have seem them in any Catechism at all (for example the CCC-Compendium), nor apparently St. Thomas mentions them in the Summa, etc. etc., to be silent about Holy Writ. There are quite many enumerations in Catholicism, including an enumeration of seven virtues but that's faith, hope, charity, prudence, justice, fortitude and temperance, and I'm sure if you ask a Catholic about the Seven Virtues that's what you'll get (if he knows any). There are Seven Gifts and Twelve Fruits but the idea of listing the contraries to the deadly sins, though respectable, is far from that importance apparently given in the Wikipedia. Also, in this list, to my unimportant ears liberality would sound better that charity, being the more directly opposition of greed, and a virtue indeed; but maybe it was wished that the Christian virtue should appear herself in the list of the contrary virtues. If somebody is so absolutely neutral that he doesn't want to agree with the, thanks to God, unanimous assertion that charity is something good, and thus doesn't want to call it virtue, he would be (well, an odd fellow, and) forced to call it a habit, since a virtue is a good habit. Charity is not a practice, but a specific act of charity, the giving of alms, is a practice of charity. --
84.154.106.75 (
talk)
20:13, 30 October 2010 (UTC)reply
@84.154.106.75: charity is both a virtue and a practice. Therefore, the distinction of the two articles doesn't make sense. It would be better to distinguish a general article for the practice and then a set of specific articles related to the different religions pr the way which they cal charity: namely, the article for Christians is "charity (virtue)". As it was cited St Thomas Aquinas for which charity is the habit a believer (or a Medieval soldier of Christ) chooses to wear to serve Jesus Christ God, we must add it's impossible he had said charity is not a practice, given that he wrote one of the most systematic exegetic commentaries of the Pauline epistles and that St Paul wrote an hymn for the virtue we are talking about in
1 Cortinhians 13.
Philosopher81sp (
talk)
14:18, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Cleanup
This article has two big problems and many smaller ones:
No definition or introductory section
Focuses overwhelmingly on Christian ideas, without even acknowledging this bias
While most religions have notions about almsgiving, the use of the word "charity" in the other sense of caritas or agape, as in "faith, hope and charity", is a specifically Christian theological term.
Jheald07:21, 26 February 2007 (UTC)reply
Okay, I have now split out the material on
Charity (practice) into a separate article, per Stephen Kenny's suggestion above. I hope this page is now approaching something reasonable. But the new other article now needs a lot of work.
Jheald09:47, 26 February 2007 (UTC)reply
WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class.
BetacommandBot03:50, 10 November 2007 (UTC)reply
Images in the article ...
I would like to know the reason why the coin image is being constantly removed. I see no difference with the other images in the article. Let me clarify that I have myself a bit of doubt about the notability in the article, so I am open to suggestions.
Miguel.mateo (
talk)
08:06, 5 June 2008 (UTC)reply
Because frankly the notability of the coin to the subject of this article is minimal. Which is the same reason that paragraphs about it have aready been removed from
Charity (practice) and
Christianity.
And if the coin isn't notable enough (it's hardly an iconic image) to deserve discussion in text, then as a
non-free image, we can't have an image of it either. (And I'm not at all sure it even illustrates the subject of this article anyway).
Jheald, if you think notability is really low, then remove it, no big deal. I thought it was a good image for an article that it is imageless. How about just leaving the coin and not taking anything about the technicalities? Will do some changes, let me know.
Miguel.mateo (
talk)
12:15, 5 June 2008 (UTC)reply
Should the lead-in (& therefore overall tone) of this article be centered around the "christian" virtue of charity? I found my way here through a link on the
Seven virtues page under a section expanding on the
Psychomachia... For obvious reasons, the page itself should attempt to take a wider perspective.
Lastoobs (
talk)
21:51, 14 April 2013 (UTC)reply
obviously
by "obvious reasons" I mean to say that the term "christian" doesn't show up until around 16c while the term "charity" enjoys usage as early as 12c & while "Christianity" hails as early as 1300, & still not forgetting that the words 'charity' & 'christ' are linguistically linked together, the fact of the matter is that the idea of "christ" is actually a parallel to the idea of the Hebrew "mashiah" which dates 200BC and beyond... so, maybe the 'virtue' itself shouldn't be blatantly labeled as 'christian' when 'christian' is itself a translation.
Lastoobs (
talk)
22:06, 14 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Christ, written with the capital letter as for a proper name and for it is the name of the Son of God, is the Greek translation of the Jewish word Mashiah. It is used in
Sirach 11.15 and
Proverbs 19.17;40.24, just to say the ancient origin of this ethical value. The Book of Proverbs is effectively dated to the
Solomon's era. But as Christian shall believe its origin is much more older. Otherwise, St Paul couldn't have dedicated an entire hymn to the charity without saying the world had been destroyed for a second time after the universal deluge.
Philosopher81sp (
talk)
14:09, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
lead in... wtf?
it's almost like the lead in is trying to make charity seem like more than it really is, as a virtue & a concept. Charity is "benevolence for the poor," I think what the lead in is missing is the idea that this concept is literally "the friendship of man for God", that sharing does actually "unites us to God"... as it stands, I'm rather demotivated to improve upon the lead in, but still. What about loving kindness & generosity is so hard to equate to virtue status without going all religOmatic on us. Have we forgotten what virtues even are?
virtue (n.)
early 13c., "moral life and conduct, moral excellence," vertu, from Anglo-French and Old French vertu, from Latin virtutem (nominative virtus) "moral strength, manliness, valor, excellence, worth," from vir "man" (see virile).
For my part I honour with the name of virtue the habit of acting in a way troublesome to oneself and useful to others. [Stendhal "de l'Amour," 1822]
Phrase by virtue of (early 13c.) preserves alternative Middle English sense of "efficacy." Wyclif Bible has virtue where KJV uses power. The seven cardinal virtues (early 14c.) were divided into the natural (justice, prudence, temperance, fortitude) and the theological (hope, faith, charity). To make a virtue of a necessity (late 14c.) translates Latin facere de necessitate virtutem [Jerome]. (from etymonline dot com)
Lastoobs (
talk)
22:15, 14 April 2013 (UTC)reply