This article was nominated for deletion on 30 March 2020. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article, while still at stub-level was described as partially promotional / borderline notable.
The topic is certainly not borderline notable, even if the writing may seem "partially promotional" and if that's how it's been perceived, then WP:PRESERVE would seem to suggest that it needs improvement.
That's what the Wiki editing process is about. Was/is it (still) (?below?) stub level? Pi314m ( talk) 09:54, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
(tps of article creator) Not sure this is completely G11. Was tempted to remove Speedy to allow for community to judge at AfD but perhaps best left to return to draft for a bit. Note sure which way I'd !vote at an AfD if I chose to !vote at it. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 11:31, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) it was written as a history of an organization that was funded for an educational purpose. The organization's most recent top executive did in fact make a cringe-worthy statement, and this did give me second thoughts about enhancing the article. I do not want the history of the organization lost, so I will attempt (mostly this will have to wait for next week) to at least trim some wording that is perhaps better presented below rather than on top of the article. -- Pi314m ( talk) 18:17, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
The article, as edited, presents both the day school and the supplementary education approaches. It arcs from the 1990 report that incorporated a wide NPOV range of participants, through hiring its first director (Hoffmann, who by definition had to meet NPOV, since ((thru 2010)) he dealt with the full range of the Jewish Agency and worldwide groups such as CRIF in France, which doesn't even use the name Jewish but rather Israelite, a term that USA writers no longer seem to use), and includes information about the two major organizations who compete in this area. Pi314m ( talk) 08:23, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
The use of a 2019 Avi Chai Foundation ad about CIJE but "reported" by JTA is not meant so much for supporting the "10 years out of date" (phrasing above) data but rather to note that these programs are still ongoing. I'm aware that the ending words of "This article was produced by JTA’s native content team" means ads designed to blend into and appeal to readers, described as native to what they are reading. Pi314m ( talk) 06:27, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Not surprisingly, International Technology and Engineering Educators Association indexed CIJE for "the 82nd Annual ITEEA Conference" (March 11, 2020). https://www.iteea.org/16770.aspx Pi314m ( talk) 03:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)