![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Peer reviewers:
BBCBAB.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 17:03, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
I'm giving this article some attention, but welcome anyone else who would like to work on expanding it. Courtland 02:25, 2005 Mar 13 (UTC)
current thought on organizing the article:
I'm thinking that all types of cell culture could be addressed in a general sense, with specific articles spinning off for things like insect cell culture, plant tissue culture, culture of anaerobic bacterial pathogens, viral culture, etc. Courtland 02:29, 2005 Mar 13 (UTC)
I don't think that there needs to be much mention of microbial culturing. Make a link to microbiology, fermentation etc. In my experience cell culture in it's modern sense means, to the laboratory scientist, mainly animal and plant cell culture. Microbial cell culture is a term one hardly ever hears.--
Alun 06:04, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
(not articles yet)
Interesting that article ignores the many legal issues re cell cultures. a. Are donors informed that their cells re being used? b. Are donors paid for their cells? c. Who owns the patents, trademarks? d. Who monitors the legal ramifications of cell cultture businesses in order to protect patients, the public? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:DDC7:1700:1180:C261:C499:5D79 ( talk) 04:50, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abcdefghikjlmnop ( talk • contribs) 21:43, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Sorry for my ignorance, but what is the relevance of this section to "cell culture"? Kaisershatner 18:32, 18 April 2006 (UTC).
Shouldn't "op.cit" contain more information? WAS 4.250 19:23, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
For something that has so many applications in agriculture, medicine, and basic research both articles are extremely weak. The tissue culture should have the history and animal-plant distinctions and organ,tissue, cell distinction. I can see the cell culture needs to be its own article but is it at that stage presently or should it be fused with the weaker Tissue culture? The history of tissue culture could be a distinct article with the history of methodologies in culture, synchronizing cells, labeling cells, heterokaryons, hybridomas, suspension, substrates, transformation, contact inhibition, Hayflick senescence and now telomeres, SV-40 virus, etc. GetAgrippa 19:05, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
I am tempted to add at the top:
Maybe on 1 april next year... -- Squidonius ( talk) 15:21, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Culture of non-mammalian cells needs a section on insect cell culture. I'm not an expert, and was actually looking to see if there was anything here on the topic. In my very limited understanding, I gather that people sometimes use insect cells in applications when mammalian cells might introduce unwanted background (because there is so much difference between insects and mammals). Can someone else comment or make an appropriate contribution to the article? Lcwilsie ( talk) 16:09, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
There are two lists of common cell lines at the end of this article. Perhaps they should be combined into one? 142.103.207.10 ( talk) 22:31, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
The melanomic origin of MDA-MB-435 does not seem to be disputed, but firmly established. Even the link in the article states it as a matter of fact (and rightfully so). Because of the importance of the topic (30 years of breastcancer research need to be reviewed) an expert should take a look at it. 217.231.48.197 ( talk) 17:27, 30 October 2008 (UTC).
Does anyone know if the Ma-Mel cell lines and Mel (e.g Mel 624) cell lines are one and the same? Yvaud ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:41, 17 January 2010 (UTC).
I think the article could spell out the difference (if any?) between cell line and cell culture as cell line redirects here. Throughout the article the two are used somewhat interchangeably which I find undesirable since the terms -- at least in my head -- are not completely the same. Can any expert elaborate? Thanks. Bilgrau ( talk) 09:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
ثقافة النباتية خلية معزول — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.207.147.196 ( talk) 11:10, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Hmmmmm.... Maybe I'm missing something here, but it appears as though there been some kind of weird duplication error in the list of cell lines. I'm going to attempt to address it. NickCT ( talk) 16:12, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cell culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:12, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Including the reference for hPL vs. FBS. Also, the general culturing parameters of 37C and 5% CO2 should be labelled as typical as some cell lines like MDA-kb2 do not need CO2 at all.
BBCBAB ( talk) 15:14, 12 August 2017 (UTC) BBCBAB ( talk) 21:29, 14 August 2017 (UTC)SJH
Please see (and add to) Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject Molecular and Cell Biology#Refactoring of the cell line lists if you are interested in this. Tomdo08 ( talk) 20:25, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
This section is not about the references section in the subject page: There are references in this talk page; without putting the reflist into a separate chapter, it looks like they belong to the random chapter which happens to be the last.
I'm not sure, what it should say and English isn't my naive language, so I didn't dare to edit it, but does the following paragraph make sense?
"An important example of such a complex protein is the hormone erythropoietin. The cost of growing mammalian cell cultures is high, so research is underway to produce such complex proteins in insect cells or in higher plants, use of single embryonic cell and somatic embryos as a source for direct gene transfer via particle bombardment, transit gene expression and confocal microscopy observation is one of its applications. It also offers to confirm single cell origin of somatic embryos and the asymmetry of the first cell division, which starts the process." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carroll D. ( talk • contribs) 23:22, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Ayda P (
article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Ayda P ( talk) 03:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC) I have combined Tissue culture and Cell culture articles and added few sentences and cited the papers I used to do the edits — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayda P ( talk • contribs) 19:50, 17 September 2022 (UTC)