This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Catching Fire article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Catching Fire has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Has anyone found out more reviews? We only have one. THat part of the article really needs improvement. -- Glimmer721 ( talk) 21:55, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Should the Entertainment Weekly article really be quoted here? It doesn't seem like a very reliable source. Almost every commenter on that page agrees that the reviewer doesn't seem to have read the book. - 131.229.158.89 ( talk) 03:48, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
I have spell checked the entire article. There were no spelling errors. KF5LLG ( talk) 14:57, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Catching Fire - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RM bot 04:21, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
I think we should add the genre "Romance novel" to all HG books. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.88.4.33 ( talk) 05:30, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
The movie needs it's own page already. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.255.163.32 ( talk) 02:00, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Is the title of the book a reference to the Gerard Manley Hopkins poem, ' As kingfishers catch fire, dragonflies draw flame'? evin290 ( talk) 21:39, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will ( talk · contribs) 20:30, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
The article is very well written - I did not even detect any grammatical errors that I needed to fix. It is well-organized, and complies with the MOS guidelines for layout and content in general. Oh, is this the Top Secret room? I had no idea... ( talk) 21:00, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
The article uses two handfuls of reliable, third-party sources, and makes frequent citations to them. Nothing appears to be original research. Oh, is this the Top Secret room? I had no idea... ( talk) 21:00, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
The article covers all areas one would expect an article of good quality on a book to cover, and does not contain anything in the way of trivia. If the reviews quoted in the "Critical Reception" section speak the truth about the book, I might say that the article is just as well-paced. Oh, is this the Top Secret room? I had no idea... ( talk) 21:00, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
The article's content is completely neutral towards the topic and all related things covered. Oh, is this the Top Secret room? I had no idea... ( talk) 21:00, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
While the article sees a great deal of vandalism, a check of the revisions over the last three months indicates that no edit warring about the proper content itself has taken place. Oh, is this the Top Secret room? I had no idea... ( talk) 20:39, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
The sole image used in the article is used appropriately under fair use laws, with valid rationale and license provided. It is an essential image to use in illustrating the article, as it depicts the front cover of the book that the article covers. Oh, is this the Top Secret room? I had no idea... ( talk) 20:36, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
After reading and evaluating the content of this article, I am satisfied that it is ready to be included amongst the Literature GAs. Congratulations! Oh, is this the Top Secret room? I had no idea... ( talk) 21:01, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Catching Fire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:48, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I thought it was okay to freely add categories without citation, please correct me if I'm wrong. The category was "Sacrifice in human fiction" because the novel depicts children being sacrificed in an annual game show. If I must cite my addition, this is my source, I suppose. Ma nam is geoffrey ( talk) 22:50, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
I cannot find anything online relating this novel to Scipione Borghese, an Italian aristocrat from the early 20th century, aside from this Wikipedia article, which says: ″It is cited as a retelling of Scipione Borghese, 10th Prince of Sulmona's second book from the early 20th century.″ I also found no mention of this name in Catching Fire itself. Either a citation should be added or this sentence should be removed. Louiseb133 ( talk) 21:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)