This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Draft:Saltatory pattern of fetal heart rate page were merged into Cardiotocography on 14 April 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Cardiotocography.
|
I could not find any article regarding STAN on wikipedia. STAN is an acronym for ST-analysis and is the addition of ST-segment analysis to the standard CTG recording. This has shown to be a better and more precise method than CTG alone, and is now in widespread use. Could someone write an article on this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.165.75.134 ( talk) 15:07, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
This article should be merged with Cardiotocograph and possibly also with Nonstress test. -- Una Smith ( talk) 04:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
This article currently has no refs. One good ref is (Mires, G.; Williams, F.; Howie, P. (2001). "Randomised controlled trial of cardiotocography versus Doppler auscultation of fetal heart at admission in labour in low risk obstetric population". BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 322 (7300): 1457–1460, discussion 1460–2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7300.1457. PMC 32308. PMID 11408301.) re cardiotocography vs Doppler auscultation. -- Una Smith ( talk) 04:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
The tone is wrong and some seems to be from [1]. 87.83.31.234 ( talk) 07:39, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
You say: proposed terminology of a three-tiered system to replace the older undefined terms "reassuring" and "nonreassuring" Sure.. but you should mention what reassuring and nonreassuring is Remember this is just a PROPOSAL 182.255.99.214 ( talk) 09:51, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Cardiotocography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:59, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
IntelligentAgent300 has added (and then re-added after reversion) a section about an innovative AI method for cardiotocography interpretation. I argue that this section, being based on a method proposed by a single author in a text book chapter, with no evidence that the method has been implemented and proven in practice, is speculative at best and does not yet merit inclusion in this article. See WP:MEDRS for a discussion of reliable sources on medical information. I invite IntelligentAgent300 to discuss this matter. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 14:20, 30 April 2021 (UTC)