Carapace is part of WikiProject Turtles, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use
turtle resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information
.TurtlesWikipedia:WikiProject TurtlesTemplate:WikiProject Turtlesturtle articles
{{
Extinct turtles}} and fossil forms of both living and extinct turtles requires attention:many extinct articles require either expansion or creation and sources seems hard to come by. A list
of fossil forms is being compiled so progress can be charted.
Patrol: recent changes to turtle articles and check for improvements or errors.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArthropodsWikipedia:WikiProject ArthropodsTemplate:WikiProject ArthropodsArthropods articles
This article is part of WikiProject Animal anatomy, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to
animal anatomy apart from
human anatomy. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at
WikiProject Animal anatomy. This project is an offshoot of WikiProject AnimalsAnimal anatomyWikipedia:WikiProject Animal anatomyTemplate:WikiProject Animal anatomyAnimal anatomy articles
This article was selected as the article for improvement on 27 December 2021 for a period of one week.
Pull out and make unique articles for reptiles.
If I may suggest. I feel that as an encyclopedia we would be better served if the Carapace, and
Plastron pages were combined into a single article on the turtle shell. With appropriate sections on Carapace and Plastron. These features of the turtle are heavily used in identification and morphological analysis of the members of this group, they are also the predominant remains for fossil species. Hence, having a page that defines all these features, discusses the evolutionary history of the shell and also looks at the differences among families etc would be of great benefit. This is a large amount of information as many greatly misunderstand the structure of this part of the turtle. Cheers
Faendalimastalk 19:05, 15 October 2011 (UTC)reply
I am enclined to agree Faendalimas. Shall we formally request a merge of the two articles?--
NYMFan69-86 (
talk) 20:35, 15 October 2011 (UTC)reply
I would suggest we write a new page on the turtle shell, taking plastron and carapace out of the current docs and leave the rest for their other definitions. Then set up disambiguations for carapace and plastron making the turtle ones point to the relevant sections of the turtle shell page. Cheers,
Faendalimastalk 03:47, 16 October 2011 (UTC)reply
What would be the name of the new article? Would there be new redirects, would
Plastron turn into a redirect, a disambiguation or stay as it is would the turtle stuff? If the turtle info was taken from Plastron there would not be much leftRegards,
SunCreator(
talk) 14:36, 16 October 2011 (UTC)reply
For the material that remains on those pages I guess those interested in editing that material would have to expand it, a definition only referring readers onwards could be left for turtles. As for the name I would suggest Turtle Shell, but important would be the subtitles on the page. A disambiguation for plastron would point to Turtle Shell#Plastron. To be honest a disambiguation would be the best way then that page could point to aircraft turtles, insects, whatever. My interest is the turtles here, I am not suggesting deleting the other material but separating it out. I feel the turtle material from several pages would serve better as a single page. Cheers,
Faendalimastalk 18:13, 16 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Turtle shell would certainly make a viable article; there are plenty of things that could be discussed. The
Plastron article definitely should not have information about both turtles and airplanes; something an encyclopedia would never do. I do think
Carapace should remain it's own article however, it's interesting to note how carapaces have evolved in other critters in addition to turtles. --
NYMFan69-86 (
talk) 03:15, 17 October 2011 (UTC)reply
ok on my todo list then, give me a week have a broken finger, so can't type efficiently just now. Cheers
Faendalimastalk 17:22, 18 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Those were just my opinions; hopefully if implemented they would help things out. Heal up Faendalimas, Wikipedia needs ya.--
NYMFan69-86 (
talk) 04:17, 24 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Ok my hand is a lot better can sort of type now. I am going to start creating a page on the
Turtle Shell it already exists and redirects to turtle, I will leave the redirect in till the page has the substance I feel it needs. The remove the redirect. Cheers,
Faendalimastalk 18:56, 2 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Phanares
Article currently
[1] reads in part In arachnids, the carapace is formed by the fusion of prosomal tergites into a single plate which carries the eyes, ocularium, ozopores (a pair of openings of the scent gland of Opiliones) and diverse phaneres... (my emphasis).
What is a phanare? The citation is not available online as far as I can see. I tried to Wikilink the term, but we currently have no article
phanare, nor is there an entry at
wikt:phanare. A
quick Google was no help at all (your results may vary).
New pages required, or at least an explanatory note for we non-specialists.
Andrewa (
talk) 14:24, 17 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Ehrenberg's term?
If the introduction of carapace into zoological vocabulary (in 1836, according to various dictionaries) was due to
Christian Gottfried Ehrenberg, a brief remark to that effect would improve the article.
Wetman (
talk) 20:40, 24 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Ants - do they have a carapace?
Ants - do they have a carapace? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
156.67.241.149 (
talk) 13:25, 11 December 2018 (UTC)reply
The Expand from German template
I suggest Template:Expand German be removed.
The corresponding German article is much more detailed but it has no inline citations whatsoever, save on one particular point. Expanding the English article using material translated from the German article would either introduce a mass of original research or else involve reconstructing all the unreferenced research that has gone into the German article.