This article is within the scope of the Greater Boston Public Transit WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of public transportation in the Greater Boston metropolitan area. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Greater Boston Public TransitWikipedia:WikiProject Greater Boston Public TransitTemplate:WikiProject Greater Boston Public TransitGreater Boston Public Transit articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion. See also:
WikiProject Trains to do list and the
Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I'm not sure its a good idea to include the map of the former Amtrak Cape Codder service. I think this could be confusing for readers are on the CapeFLYER page because they're interested in Boston to Cape Cod service, which I think should be the focus of this page.
FFM784 (
talk) 03:02, 20 February 2013 (UTC)reply
I believe it's relevant because it was the last rail service of any type offered to the Cape with mainland connections. It doesn't need anything more than a couple sentences, but the history would be markedly incomplete without it. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a travel guide.
Pi.1415926535 (
talk) 03:18, 20 February 2013 (UTC)reply
I agree. Amtrak's Cape Codder was an important milestone in the long road to the return of passenger service to the Cape. But I took the map out since it seems to me that many readers will be confused by this map. The primary focus of the CapeFLYER page should be on the new Boston to Cape Cod passenger service, which has a very rich history of its own.
FFM784 (
talk) 03:42, 20 February 2013 (UTC)reply
Fair enough. Sometime when I'm bored I'll probably do the research on the Cape Cod & Hyannis and make a route map for that, which would be more appropriate. Hopefully this summer the article will get populated with images of the new service running anyway.
Pi.1415926535 (
talk) 04:43, 20 February 2013 (UTC)reply
I'm looking around for a B&W image from the 50s that can be included in the Return of Boston to Cape Cod service section. The image I'm thinking of has a set of trains on at Buzzards Bay station. When I find something I'll post it.
67.85.226.48 (
talk) 16:38, 20 February 2013 (UTC)reply
The major distinction between the two articles and the two trains is that Amtrak's Cape Codder offered New York (as opposed to Boston) to Cape Cod service. That has not been restored with the CapeFlyer service.
Dogru144 (
talk) 16:28, 3 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Requested move
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was moved to
CapeFlyer. --
BDD (
talk) 19:16, 23 October 2013 (UTC)reply
CapeFLYER → Cape Flyer – I made this move but was reverted, so I'm going to put it up for discussion.
MOS:FOLLOW states that trademark capitalization shouldn't be used in titles unless it's an acronym, and to my knowledge it's not. Therefore I'm proposing that this page be moved to either
Cape Flyer or
CapeFlyer. —
Train2104 (
talk •
contribs) 12:29, 14 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Support move to
CapeFlyer; news reports don't use a space. I didn't think about the MOS when I named the article but you're correct that we don't generally follow that sort of capitalization.
Kiss (band) might be the canonical example.
Mackensen(talk) 13:09, 14 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Support move to CapeFlyer per Mackensen. 'Cape Flyer' is incorrect and should be avoided.
Pi.1415926535 (
talk) 21:27, 14 October 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.