This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article has been
automatically rated by a
bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a
stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Squatting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
squatting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SquattingWikipedia:WikiProject SquattingTemplate:WikiProject Squattingsquatting articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Proposed for Deletion as this is advertising for the company.
There seems to be no notable interest for this article to exist.— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
AliHog (
talk •
contribs) 17:29, 21 December 2010
Hello AliHog, the secondary sources show that the company is notable, and I tried to keep a neutral tone and my intention was not to promote this company. Do you have any specific criticisms or suggestions? Perhaps with your interest in this area, you know of more critical sources we could use to improve the article.
Grim23★ 22:27, 22 December 2010 (UTC)reply
The reason for my request was based on the nature of the information you disclose. The article includes costings and what could be interpreted as a "pricing structure" which then suggests that it is advertising. It may be advisable to remove the monetary values but still include that occupiers pay fees. This would also save on editing as, presumably, these costings must change regularly as Camelot are an active business. I also picked up on the tone of the last line. It seems to suggest that Camelot provide other services but then gives no details on these services. There seems to be no reason for mentioning the services unless for the specific purpose of advertising that they exist. It may be worthwhile providing more information on these other services to justify why they are notable.
You're quite right, (
Wikipedia is not a directory #5) I've removed the prices and changed "traditional security services" to "security guards". (Btw, type ~~~~ after your posts to sign and time stamp your comment)
Grim23★ 13:51, 11 January 2011 (UTC)reply