Cambium Learning Group is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
education and
education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article has been
automatically rated by a
bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a
stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is an extension of the existing article
Kurzweil Educational Systems. Seeing as this company now owns Kurzweil Educational Systems, it seems disingenuous that this article should be nominated for speedy deletion while Kurzweil Educational Systems is not. I don't see why a stub article should be instantly nominated for speedy deletion, since the point of a stub is to see if it will grow. Given the depth of and cross-linking to Kurzweil, I see no reason to suspect this article will not behave similarly. Additionally, see
my response to the Speedy Deletion of
ExploreLearning, which is a subsidiary of Cambium Learning Technologies. —
Epastore (
talk) 18:31, 17 May 2010 (UTC)reply
Hi Epastore - do you know if it will be possible to find independent reliable sources (newspapers, books etc) that attest to the notability of this company? That is really the only standard that matters on Wikipedia. I'm not asking you to actually PRODUCE such citations, but just whether you think it's likely that they exist or not.
Thparkth (
talk) 14:07, 18 May 2010 (UTC)reply
I think so, but am not sure. I do know that their parent company is notable (it is
publicly traded), and also that at least two of their subsidiary companies (the two which currently have Wikipedia articles) are notable. It may be that this article should be subsumed into a new article about their parent:
Cambium Learning Group. —
Epastore (
talk) 22:05, 19 May 2010 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on
Cambium Learning Group. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.