This article was nominated for deletion on 28 December 2021. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This page was proposed for deletion by Anton.bersh ( talk · contribs) on 30 April 2021. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
CAcert has been running nearly for 4 years now Wildcat paris 12:53, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
So, from a certain point, it could be just fake certifications? Doesn't it make CAcert certificates useless?
How can I tell these certificates apart? How can I instruct my computer to e.g. trust the web of trust certificates, but distrust the robot certficates? Do they use a different root certificate? What is the use of robot certificates? Shinobu 07:40, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
150,000 as of September 2006? Can someone update this? — Bob • ( talk) • 08:28, July 29, 2007 (UTC)
I'm a bit vague on the details, but according to this announcement by CAcert they have decided on a Community Agreement and have "conquered that monumental task", I assume referring to "... the need to have CAcert Root Key included in the browsers. For this CAcert started the Audit process ..."
Can the article be updated, is it ready to be modified? M. W. Holt ( talk) 01:54, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Why is this names CAcert.org rather than CAcert? -- Chealer ( talk) 09:02, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
I have the root certificate for cacert.org showing in a default install of Mozilla Firefox 3.0.13 (Windows XP). This section could be updated. I have neither the time nor interest to search out when it was first included. 64.90.193.188 ( talk) 14:57, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
It is not included in FF 14.0.1. If asking users to import it into FF would make all WOT certificates be recognized as valid, this should be documented in the article. It might make distributed applications without the great expense of renting security certificates possible without much risk of viruses or malware, yes? What a wonderful possibility for all small software providers! David Spector ( user/ talk) 15:40, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
What is Ark Linux? Typo? :) 108.184.91.123 ([[User talk:108.184.91.123|talk]]) 00:17, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
The german article is more complete than the rest of languages. I have left them a comment asking to add the extra information they have to the english article. If you are reading it and you can translate from german, $USERS will thank you ;) -- PabloCastellano ( talk) 02:25, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest and
neutral point of view.
|
I object to this paragraph:
In December 2015, the CAcert Inc. Board of Directors took action to disregard an adverse ruling the board received in an arbitration case submitted according to the CAcert Community dispute resolution policies. The board subsequently suspended the hearing arbitrator in the case. [1] This action by the board has caused several members to discuss creating a new organization distinct from CAcert Inc. [2] The Board has taken further action to suspend at least one community member for discussing the legality of these actions on a public CAcert mailing list. [3]
, which was added by User:Neoeinstein, on the following grounds:
As a member of CAcert Inc., I have a conflict of interest with the subject, and am hesitant to make edits to this paragraph. I would therefore be very thankful if User:Neoeinstein or someone else could address these issues. Otherwise, if there is no reaction within one week, I plan to remove the entire paragraph by reverting this edit. I would consider that revert to be an edit with little risk of bias, and one that would improve the article. — Lucas Werkmeister ( talk) 21:37, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Please note: This is not based on current developments. The request for a new association is there for years and CAcert Inc wants to have it.
Again I want to emphasise that this is meant to be to discuss the future of CAcert it is not meant to be against CAcert Inc.
As I understood Eva's mail, she does not want to set up an alternative to CAcert Inc ... Anyway, I agree: We are not here to start setting up an alternative organisation instead of CAcert Inc. We are only here for discussing how such a future association in Europa should look like and in which country it could be located.
yes, Bernd explained it in a good way. It is to identify the minimalist core of an association ...
Most certainly this is NOT a fork! The procedure you described [quoted email: We would talk about this move here ... and then take the results of these discussions back to CAcert proper ... and make decisions there] is pretty much what is intended.
CAcert itself has a press review, with third-party sources: https://wiki.cacert.org/PressPass — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eruedin ( talk • contribs) 14:21, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Some (unchecked) sources via ProQuest, though some are only passing mention.
Thankyou Djm-leighpark ( talk) 08:26, 31 December 2021 (UTC)