This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Lintz page were merged into Burnopfield on 23 July 2018. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Having lived in the village for a long time this must be merged. There is no distinct village of Sheephill. There were in the past a number of villages i.e. Lintz, Leazes, Burnopfield and to a lesser extent even Crookgate that have become known as Burnopfield. Try to find the village of Sheephill on a map. All you will find is a street at the East of Burnopfield called Sheephill. Markthompson77 ( talk) 11:54, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Sheephill is a street within Burnopfield and definitely does not carry the village status. The Sheephill article does not however, suggest that Sheephill is a village in its own right. User —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.15.27.103 ( talk) 16:34, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
An image used in this article, File:BurnopfieldStJames.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:BurnopfieldStJames.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 15:32, 6 May 2012 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Burnopfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:26, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
I propose that Lintz be merged into Burnopfield. The former is an extremely short stub about an adjacent hamlet, with a map reference being the only source provided. It can be easily described in the article on its larger neighbour. Jellyman ( talk) 09:24, 4 January 2017 (UTC) Agree. Tacyarg ( talk) 17:33, 21 September 2017 (UTC)