This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Boeing Defense, Space & Security article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I removed the reference to "black projects" from the Phantom Works description. Although there may be black projects underway within Phantom Works, that is not the sole (or even the primary) function of the group. andersonpd 21:45, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
We need to stamp out this inclination that people have to put their project template all over pages that have very little related content. — Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 01:18, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Image:Boeing-Logo.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 04:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Either the brimstone entry is wrong, or this one. "The missile airframe is developed from Boeing's AGM-114 Hellfire, but Brimstone is an all new design with its own motor, warhead and seeker". Does this make it a Boeing product? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Supersymetrie ( talk • contribs) 12:16, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
I think this article needs a unified template similar to this one for civilian airliners. Maybe someone would do it for us all? It would dramatically improve navigation throughout Boeing military aircraft articles. Le Grand Bleu ( talk) 06:54, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Boeing Defense, Space & Security. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 01:38, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Boeing Defense, Space & Security. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.boeing.com/ids/news/2002/q3/nr_020710a.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/MapItDrawServlet?geo_id=16000US2904906&_bucket_id=50&tree_id=420&context=saff&_lang=en&_sse=onWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:35, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Boeing Defense, Space & Security. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:14, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Does it really need to specify that? I honestly thought I was on the simple English wikipedia for a second, I think division is understandable Aquaticsans ( talk) 03:02, 2 January 2024 (UTC)