 | This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • Redshift Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Redshift |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
- The following discussions are closed. Please do not modify them. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, Talk:Blueshift. No further edits should be made to these discussions.
How come Redshift is an featured article while this one is a stub? Isn't it the same phenomenon only that they are each others opposites? Perhaps a merge? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.228.228.224 ( talk • contribs)
- The
Redshift article is extremely well-sourced, and has lots of illustrations and context. A merge would not be a bad idea. --
Kuzaar-
T-
C- 11:41, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- It is strange anyway. People must prefer red over blue or something :P. Soon2Bregistered 81.228.228.224 17:53, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- Perhaps because this article isn't currently very good? ErkDemon 02:20, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
I added a little bit about the limit to blue shift, makes the article a little bit better I think. Feel free to elaborate.-- MaizeAndBlue86 ( talk) 00:28, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Why was this redirected to redshift? None of the information here was merged to that article. 70.51.9.237 ( talk) 11:35, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
If the information was useful and non-overlapping, perhaps get it from the history and upload it on the redshift? Headbomb { ταλκ – WP Physics: PotW} 12:12, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
11:17, 23 July 2008 128.214.166.211 (2,971 bytes) (removed pseudoscience)
Limit of blue shiftAccording to well accepted quantum theory, the limit of blue-shift is approached when a half-wavelength of light approaches the planck length. This corresponds to a half-wavelength of 1.616x10^-35 meters, and a frequency of 9.276x10^42 Hz (and defines a minimum period of 1.078x10^-43 seconds, which therefore must be the minimum increment of time in the universe). |
Should this article not be renamed to blueshift? Redshift is one word. — Anonymous Dissident Talk 04:16, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
this is relatively minor, but shouldn't there be something on the bottom labeling this article as a stub? —Preceding unsigned comment added by GundamMerc ( talk • contribs) 02:34, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- The discussions above are closed. Please do not modify them. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, Talk:Blueshift. No further edits should be made to these discussions.