This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all
Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to
join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in
film,
literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Theres quite a substantial article on the character already. I'm proposing a merger as a section of this article
GainLine ♠♥ 11:03, 26 June 2009 (UTC)reply
I would disagree with the merge as this is a standalone movie. BigDuncTalk 11:09, 26 June 2009 (UTC)reply
Fair point, I may have been hasty though I would say that it may have to be reviewed in the future depending on the success of the movie
GainLine ♠♥ 11:34, 26 June 2009 (UTC)reply
I also disagree with a merge. There should be more than enough coverage of the film to justify a seperate article.
PC78 (
talk) 19:32, 27 June 2009 (UTC)reply
Redirected this. There was no discussion at the main for splitting out yet and there is still very little information beyond the stuff already in the main. Split it when there is actual reception info and more than just a copy/paste the existing article's coverage with an infobox and image thrown in (which is literally all this article had) Just because it "can" be split doesn't mean it needs to be at this time. And even when it is ready for split, there is absolutely no need for a BTLV template.--
AnmaFinotera (
talk·contribs) 16:39, 28 June 2009 (UTC)reply
Reverted. The information is out there, but it can't be added to a redirect. There is more than enough basis for an article here, though I agree about the nav template.
PC78 (
talk) 16:53, 28 June 2009 (UTC)reply
I agree with the revert and have no opinion on the nav template. BigDuncTalk 16:56, 28 June 2009 (UTC)reply
Suit yourself, but y'all could have at least attempted to have this be accurate. I've now fixed numerous incorrect statements and items in the infobox that were very easy to spot. --
AnmaFinotera (
talk·contribs) 17:18, 28 June 2009 (UTC)reply
Mixed Languages
The Movie has a mixture of English and Japanese, mostly English, but a fair bit is done in Japanese so under languages I am adding Japanese.
DreamsDreams (
talk) 20:25, 4 October 2010 (UTC)DreamsDreamsreply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Blood: The Last Vampire (2009 film). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.