The company's take on the well-known You have not mentioned Burger King yet in the main text. Link it as well - links repeated from the lead are not a problem
Fixed -10:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Link McDonald's
Fixed -10:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
where rival McDonald's I think the "rival" fact should be mentioned when you first introduce McDonald's. This is its second mention
newer sandwich's ingredients were of better quality than the McDonald's product --> ingredients of the newer sandwich were of better quality than those of the McDonald's product.
Stacker sauce served on a sesame seed bun "sesame seed bun" is mentioned in the earlier section, it should be linked only there
Fixed 11:15, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Chowhound.com readers rated the Quad Stacker How reliable is this website? What exactly is it for?
Comment: - Chowhound is food and restaurant review site run by American media company
CBS Interactive.
the Impulsive Buy What is this?
Comment: - The Impulsive Buy is a long running review blog that focuses on fast food. It has been running for more than a decade now.
about -Jeremy (
blah blah •
I did it!) 11:15, 6 March 2016 (UTC)reply
in the three months ended Sept. 30 I have generally seen months written in full words.
Fixed 11:15, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
didn't scale at the same rate as increasing numbers "didn't" may be expanded
The BK Toppers line was a line of cheeseburgers introduced in October 2011 Please add the company name when you begin a section
Fixed -17:28, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
The 1st para is unsourced
Fixed -11:28, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Could "sauteed mushrooms" be linked?
Comment: According to the guidelines on wikilinking, common terms such as mushrooms should not be linked unless there is compelling reason to do so. However, I will link sauteing as some people may be unfamiliar with the term. --Jeremy (
blah blah •
I did it!) 17:28, 6 March 2016 (UTC)reply
A chicken variant introduced in May 2014. Should "was" be added or is something missing?
Fixed -17:38, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Link Middle East
Fixed -17:38, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
because of a new approach by the company was taking regarding new and LTO products Is it a typo or is something missing? LTO should be explained here, not in the next section.
Comment: - the term was explained in the lead, however I did not define the term in the body of the article. --Jeremy (
blah blah •
I did it!) 17:38, 6 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The idea of reintroducing older, possibly discontinued products is appealing to companies ... their kitchen operations. Could be shortened and/or reworded so that it looks like original research and does not deviate from the main topic.
Comment: - The sentence is a run-on, I fixed that. I don't understand what you mean by OR. --Jeremy (
blah blah •
I did it!) 17:43, 6 March 2016 (UTC)reply
I think this section repeats some facts from the earlier sections (like the Big Mac), could it be merged into them?
Not fixed - the opening sentence is the only part that restates the Big Mac connection, and it states this to acknowledge the earlier statement before expanding on other products from vendors other than McDonald's that compete with the Big King.
No bold is needed in this section. Bold is generally not used in the article but I believe it should be kept in the earlier sections for the sake of emphasis; but it is not so important here. You may use bullets instead
"See also" is not needed, the links are already there in the article.
Comment: - I prefer to keep the section as some people do not follow the wikilinks within the article, but instead opt to do so after reading it. --Jeremy (
blah blah •
I did it!) 08:27, 7 March 2016 (UTC)reply
@
Jerem43: I am satisfied with your replies. The article looks much better now and meets all the GA criteria. I am happy to promote this. It was a great pleasure to work with you. This review is very interesting due to all the colorful icons used!
Sainsf<^>Talk all words 08:44, 7 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.