This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
If Russian forces are no where near the town right now, what are the conditions under which it will be considered a Ukrainian victory? If not now, what will warrent the classification?
Wolf359Locutus (
talk) 23:08, 3 April 2022 (UTC)reply
This is incredibly late, so sorry. But anyway, the Russians retreated from the Northern areas of Ukraine, and they didn't hold Lebedyn.
Dawsongfg (
talk) 14:54, 4 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on
Talk:Battle of Kherson which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —
RMCD bot 05:23, 24 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The relationship of most of the villages mentioned here to Lebedyn is one of pure geography. No other source has interpreted the information that appears here collectively and termed it the "battle of Lebedyn". My Google search for the exact string, performed on 21 May 2024, returns only a single use by a reliable source (
12), a local newspaper from an island in the state of Washington writing about a resident with roots in Lebedyn. The sentence A few inconsequential military clashes are known as the “Battle of Lebedyn.” seems to indicate
WP:CIRCULAR sourcing to Wikipedia.
Regarding the content itself, perhaps the information on troop movements and occupation of villages will prove useful on the target page in helping us understand what was going on in parts of Sumy Oblast during this month, though I am not sure if the information regarding the humanitarian convoys and the details of the shelling of Lebedyn is independently notable enough to warrant mentioning in any particular article. Pinging @
Cinderella157 for suggestions here.
In the context of this war, this is pretty much a regurgitation of routine news reporting (ie nothing particularly notable). Reporting of occupation by a column of tanks on 5 March is a misrepresentation of the source. I removed it. Even after some trimming, a lot of content is loosely connected to Lebedyn - referring to several villages such as Kerdylivshchyna, about 7 km from Lebedyn. This is clearly not an independently notable event but a non-event. The article on
Lebedyn already covers the shelling adequately . There might be some material useful to the target article but more in a general sense, rather than specific to Lebedyn. The humanitarian corridor is already adequately mentioned in the target. Not much to do here.
Cinderella157 (
talk) 10:15, 22 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose — Overall campaigns/offensive articles should briefly summarize each battle, while the battle articles should focus on the minor details. This article has over 17,000 bytes worth of content, so I do not support the merge of this. The
Weather Event Writer (
Talk Page) 07:59, 11 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Your point is well taken, but I don't anticipate that most of those bytes will be merged into the target article. Will provide a detailed breakdown of what content I think should go where in a follow-up message for your consideration.
SaintPaulOfTarsus (
talk) 08:50, 11 June 2024 (UTC)reply