This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This is a well written article that exceeds the GA criteria in most areas. It's well written and covers the subject well. Sources are reliable, although I did not check any of the references. Seems pretty neutral although I don't know the subject area well enough to say for sure. Images are free, correctly tagged, and relevant.
The one thing that needs improvement about this article is reducing the length of the "Background" section, which dominates the article. Right now I don't think it passes the focus criterion because the article spends so much space on stuff that isn't directly related to the battle. buidhe 21:48, 19 February 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Buidhe: I've trimmed it down some, please have another look. The section is still rather large, but I think the background is necessary to give context for ONUC's authorisations and the European involvement in Katanga's gendarmerie. -
Indy beetle (
talk) 03:34, 5 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Thanks. I think this is fine, at least for GA status, therefore passing. buidhe 03:38, 5 March 2020 (UTC)reply