This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Battle of Glođane article. This is
not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Battle of Glođane is part of WikiProject Kosovo, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Kosovo on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the
welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please
join the project and help with our
open tasks.KosovoWikipedia:WikiProject KosovoTemplate:WikiProject KosovoKosovo articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
This article was moved without agreement, and if someone wants to rename it, it should raise request for it. --Ąnαșταη (
ταlκ) 09:50, 6 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Check the movelog. You have to request the move.
Crazydude1912 (
talk) 10:39, 6 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Everyone here needs to stop move warring. Reach a consensus on the name first, then move the page accordingly if needed. If you can't reach a consensus among yourselves, bring in outside input via requested move or similar. I've temporarily move-protected this page to stop this nonsense, but if it continues, you should expect blocks to be issued in short order. This is not how we handle naming disputes on this project.
GorillaWarfare(talk) 19:05, 6 September 2020 (UTC)reply
I agree with Anastan. No one has explained why the contemporary toponym should be replaced with a phonetic one.
Amanuensis Balkanicus (
talk) 20:15, 6 September 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Crazydude1912: maybe can start a move discussion for this to be avoided next time, because it is unnecessary. Despite the fact that some editors think that Glođane is a common term, in post-2000 bibliography the reality is very different:
Except for one source, the bibliography of the article doesn't use Glođane, but Glodjane: 1)
BBC: Serb forces have captured Glodjane, a major ethnic Albanian stronghold near the Albanian border. 2)
LA Times: Serbian police entered Glodjane, near the Albanian border 3)
Independent: The media centre said one Serb policeman was wounded in a mortar near Glodjane on Tuesday 5)The ICTY transcripts use Glodjane (
[1] 6)
Humanitarian Law Center: Glođane/Gllogjan village
@
GorillaWarfare: I've advised for a move discussion, but it's a bit awkward that a move discussion should be filed to change the spelling/variant of a toponym in the context of the wartime event (an article about the village itself would use Gllogjan), which isn't even used in the article's bibliography, let alone other sources. If there was a move discussion it would concern Gllogjan and Glodjane, but Glođane wouldn't be a reasonable option IMO.--
Maleschreiber (
talk) 04:09, 7 September 2020 (UTC)reply
I can't really advise here on the options—I stepped in administratively to stop the warring, but have next to no knowledge of the subject area. However it would seem that at least some people feel that "Glođane" ought to be one of the options, given the fact it was repeatedly moved to that location. I would just lay out all the various options and allow people to speak to which they think is best.
GorillaWarfare(talk) 14:48, 7 September 2020 (UTC)reply