A third feud should be outlined to get a more overview background of the event.
Is that really necessary? There really weren't any other main feuds, nor any back-story to them. –LAX 04:24, 19 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Yes, I was told during one on my GA Reviews by an outside WP:PW member that 3 feuds should be outlined. For
No Way Out (2004), I had trouble outlining the Mysterio/Guerrero feud, but I did the best I could for it. It doesn't matter if its not a main feud, an undercard match is fine to outline.SRX 11:42, 19 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Before the event went live on pay-per-view, Val Venis defeated Matt Hardy in a match taped for Sunday Night HEAT. - per
WP:PW/MOS, HEAT should follow the same rule as iMPACT, and be in regular font format.
The third match of the event was Chris Jericho versus Christian and Trish Stratus in a Handicap match, in which Jericho defeated both Christian and Stratus. - Why is the result shown before hand, while other's aren't in that format.
The match ended when Victoria pinned Lita after an Inside Cradle after Lita got a near fall on Victoria. - the last part "after Lita got a near..." is redundant and not relevant in that sentence.
Assaults by both men took effect, until Orton managed to pin Cactus after an RKO on a barbed wire baseball bat - the first part of the sentence doesn't flow with the rest of it, consider revising.
Edge, however, reversed assaults by Kane, who he then attempted to spear. - attempted "to spear"? remove "to" and reword it into saying that he performed a spear.
I have reword the proceeding sentence, which explains that Kane dodged the spear, causing Edge to spear the referee instead. –LAX 04:24, 19 July 2008 (UTC)reply
That works fine.SRX 11:42, 19 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Aftermath
Written well, I saw no flaws other than jargon, but not to worry for now.
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
fair use rationales:
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Written very good; though a couple of prose issues, until they are addressed, the article is On hold for the time being, good luck in improving the article.--SRX 03:28, 19 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Ok great work. Pass--SRX 15:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)reply