This article is written in
British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Disagree:
Aarong is famous enough to deserve a separate page. And more importantly most people don't even know that Aarong is owned by BRAC.-
Arman Aziz 05:09, 8 February 2007 (UTC)reply
Disagree:
BRAC as an over-75% self-sustained NGO operates numerous commercial enterprises, of which Aarong is only one. These enterprises are briefly mentioned in the BRAC article in the context of their contribution to BRAC's development efforts. However, as a well-established commercial brand name in Bangladesh and abroad on its own right, Aarong deserves a separate wiki page. To merge Aarong into the BRAC page would take away from the development focus of the BRAC page. Instead, perhaps the Aarong page can be expanded to highlight the commercial as well as development aspects of Aarong as a self-contained, highly successful business enterprise.
Disagree: the idea to merge this article with brac. Infact many people khows aarong who doesnt know what brac is.
Maybe a see also for Aarong would be appropriate?
Ragity (
talk) 19:34, 25 November 2019 (UTC)reply
BRAC is humanitarian organization and done well for poverty reduction.If the authority be aware or stop to appoint the care taker at field office under age of eighteen, that is good for the organization.I had seen a care taker of one branch, Eidgah, Cox'sbazar, may be under age of eighteen or immature for work. Please verify and if need to correction. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
202.56.7.133 (
talk •
contribs) 00:42, 6 June 2011
Merger proposal
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to merge.
Worldbruce (
talk) 23:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Social development / Prevention of Violence Against Women.
A merged article would reduce duplication and would cover these topics more thoroughly and clearly. It would do so without giving the topics undue weight within the merged article, and without making the merged article unwieldy in size.
Worldbruce (
talk) 23:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Neutrality
See
[1] for imprecise complaint about this article. I find the wording somewhat promotional.
Deb (
talk) 20:28, 6 September 2017 (UTC)reply
wp:NPOV is one consequence of primary sources. BRAC is big enough, old enough, & notable enough (if 1/2 of their claims are true) that finding secondary and tertiary sources shouldn't be a problem. I will comment further below.
Ragity (
talk) 19:26, 25 November 2019 (UTC)reply