| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Ian Rose ( talk) 01:03, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Another great British aircraft saga, like Comet -- how can I resist? Will get on to this in earnest in over the next week -- initial comment though is that for an article of this size, the lead needs to be a bit longer, at least two paragraphs. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 01:03, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
- Good suggestion, done! FWiW
Bzuk (
talk)
16:37, 22 November 2010 (UTC).
- Okay, now that we've got De Havilland Comet out of the way, I think we can all concentrate on this! Will get on to a detailed review shortly... Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 22:43, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- By the way, like the re-vamped lead -- nice and punchy, manages to get some complex points across in a straightforward manner without over-simplifying things. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk)
Technical review
- Pls fix following dab links:
- Pls check the External Links tool at above right for a few warning messages.
I adjusted and updated the ext. links. But am still getting a warning for the naa.gov.au link (last one). - fnlayson ( talk) 16:46, 7 December 2010 (UTC) Removed
GOR.339
Last sentence of first para needs citation.
Submissions
Last sentence of last para needs citation.
Mission
Last sentence of last para needs citation.
Design
Pls deal with the 'page needed' tag. ReplacedLast sentence of last para needs citation.
Testing
"16 million" what -- I assume pounds but pls specify.
Project cancellation
Last sentence of last para needs citation.
General
- Performed a light copyedit but overall it looks good, well-written/structured/illustrated. I'll place on hold and let you get on with the above items before I check image licensing, refs, and external links.Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 04:22, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- Looks like Bzuk and others have taken care of all the issues identified. Anything that was missed or needs addressing? Thanks. - fnlayson ( talk) 18:58, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
- Tks, was away from internet for a few days but will return to this review shortly. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 23:48, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, checked image licensing and refs, as well as changes since my last read-through and, apart from the need for a very minor copyedit, it all looked good so happy to pass as GA -- well done all. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 05:57, 18 December 2010 (UTC)