This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion. See also:
WikiProject Trains to do list and the
Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S.
historic sites listed on the
National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles
Can we get a picture of the old Mount Clare _station_, in addition to the existing photographs of the shops? Might the museum be willing to give us permission to use one of their pictures, if needed?
The article characterizes the museum's main building as a "roundhouse". I think most railroaders and WP:EN itself disagree. At
Roundhouse, we have:
"A roundhouse is a building used by railroads for servicing locomotives."
The subject building was never used for locomotives -- it was used for the construction of passenger cars. In fact, the Mount Clare Shops had a roundhouse, which had been constructed about thirty years earlier.
"A circular (actually 22-sided) passenger car shop, sometimes mislabeled as a roundhouse, was designed by noted architect E. Francis Baldwin and completed in 1884." [emphasis added
Unless there is substantial objection, I intend to change the article to use "circular passenger car shop" or similar language throughout. . . Jim -
Jameslwoodward (
talk to me •
contribs) 22:37, 18 October 2014 (UTC)reply
The museum's own website calls the building the Roundhouse, even with note that it was originally the passenger car shop (and that there was another roundhouse down the road). See for example the
Museum History page, a
PRNewswire item about it, and the
Museum's main page about the building. Sure reasonable to say it's not technically within that definition, but I think we need to keep calling it what they call it.
DMacks (
talk) 01:50, 19 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Agree with the correction. The 1984 HAER study of the Passenger Car Shop (which was cited in the Mt. Clare article) states that the building is "... commonly misidentified as a roundhouse." The confusion has been exacerbated by the B&O Museum's own publications. Just because the museum staff hasn't done its homework doesn't justify continuing the error. They are capable of making corrections.
Caseyjonz (
talk) 04:09, 19 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment We have to stick with what the sources say. If they call it the "Roundhouse," so should we, with a note about its true nature if it can be reliably sourced. Published self-identification supports verifiability, which unfortunately trumps truth on Wikipedia. Go with the sources, or find better ones to support your position. Anything else is
OR or
Synthesis.
GenQuest"Talk to Me" 05:04, 19 October 2014 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on
B&O Railroad Museum. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.