![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
New page created from Child psychotherapy page. Attachment based interventions only. Currently just children. Fainites barley 22:14, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Work in progress. Fainites barley 21:10, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
What's the relationship to this article? Can they be merged? / skagedal talk 16:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Hmm. It says attachment based psychotherapy is a form of psychoanalysis that is informed by attachment theory. However, attachment based therapies for children, are exactly that - therapies for children that are based on attachment theory. They are not psychoanalysis and attachment theory is not part of psychoanalysis (even though Bowlby was a psychoanalyst). On the other hand - Lieberman is psychotherapy and is, broadly speaking, a psychoanalytic approach. I suppose one could have an article called "Attachment based therapies" and include attachment based psychotherapy - whether for adults or children. I left the psychoanalytic approaches behind on the Child psychotherapy page because I thought a page trying to cover all therapies for children would be too long. Fainites barley scribs 22:59, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
This needs to be made into a complete sentence, at least. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jean Mercer ( talk • contribs) 23:43, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
It's not much help to say "these techniques" unless the techniques are described. In this statement, by the way, there is an element of apriority, as the contributor assumes that replication of earlier experiences will provide a correction for a distorted developmental trajectory-- if this claim is being made, evidence should be cited. Finally, this para gives no connection between attachment theory and DDP except for the assumption just noted. The claim is thus "confident speculation" rather than a statement based on cited evidence. Once again, a nice knock-down argument! Jean Mercer ( talk) 23:50, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Hughes has a Ph.D., so stating that is consistent with policy and it is verifiable. The additional material meets verifiable policy since the statement is supported, even if POV pushers disagree. Corkytig ( talk) 21:15, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Its totally unecessary. He's a psychologist. What more is needed? Anyway - you are yet another Weidman sock so you shouldn't be editing anyway. Fainites barley scribs 21:24, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Jean Mercers suggested checklist (from old page):
1. Targeted population (diagnosis or other characteristics like age limits)
2. Related diagnostic methods not set out for children
3. Description of intervention, including scheduling
4. Training or other characteristics of practitioners
5. Place of treatment-- home, office, residential program
6. Theoretical basis
7. Supportive research
8. Adverse events
9. Professional reviews and published comments
10. Medicaid and private insurance coverage
Fainites barley scribs 01:13, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Actually two.
Isn't Circle of security more of a prevention program? maybe not.
Why isn't Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy listed somewhere here? As I read that article it seems to fit. What am I missing? RankinUberall ( talk) 18:28, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
I don't understand why you sir, mr. fainites, are so hostile to any adding of ddp to this page. As i mentioned, i think ddp has some support, a study or two, and is a treatment that has some promising material written about it, so why not allow my edit. I thought wikipedia is supposed to allow multiple views, so even if you disagree, why are you the one to decide? Do you own this page? I didn't think that was how this site worked, but if i am wrong, so be it? PranakanLegion ( talk) 01:26, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
A user active on this article, Argon&Helium, looks to have been banned as a sock puppet in a long-term abuse case:
Accordingly, I have removed the content added by this user. Regardless, this is not an area of expertise for me, so if there's consensus that parts of the user's contributions were productive, feel free to add them back in. --— Rhododendrites talk | 14:20, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Attachment-based therapy (children). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:31, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Attachment-based therapy (children). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:48, 11 July 2017 (UTC)