This article is written in
American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
Artemis 1 was a Natural sciences good articles nominee, but did not meet the
good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
An item related to this article has been nominated to appear on the
Main Page in the "
In the news" section. You can visit the nomination to take part in the discussion. Editors are encouraged to update the article with information obtained from
reliable news sources to include recent events.
Notice date: 11 December 2022. Please remove this template when the nomination process has concluded, replacing it with
Template:ITN talk if appropriate.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to
Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
If the official name is Artemis I as said, why Artemis 1 is used here?
MachoCarioca (
talk) 00:13, 1 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Incredibly weirdly, the footnote after "officially Artemis I" seems to contradict it as well, saying: "Artemis mission names will use a roman numeral convention."
Plexust (
talk) 03:36, 10 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Gallery for Artemis 1
Hey, why do you think it may be a good idea to get rid of the gallery? Many articles have a gallery, so that's why I was wondering. No issue, simply curious why?
Spaceman2288 (
talk) 04:37, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply