This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medieval Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Medieval Scotland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Medieval ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject Medieval ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject Medieval ScotlandMedieval Scotland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shakespeare, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
William Shakespeare on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShakespeareWikipedia:WikiProject ShakespeareTemplate:WikiProject ShakespeareShakespeare articles
As this article is rated B-class by several other projects, and technically meets the word of all the B-class criteria for WPMILHIST, I have no problem assigning it that ranking. However, I do believe the article could be significantly improved by some simple format changes. Firstly, the image of the seal at the top left corner pushes the entire intro paragraph and table of contents into the center, which is awkward. Second, there are way too many sub-headings, and the text would look meatier, denser, more comprehensive if many of those were removed. I think.
LordAmeth 18:20, 28 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Hmm. An unfortunate thing to put in the lead on a biographical article. Sufficiently so that it sent me on a vandal hunt when I saw it. I also don't see this covered in the main body of the article. Perhaps an alternate way to communicate this information might be preferable? --
Xover 15:16, 6 August 2007 (UTC)reply
'tyneman' is indeed an old word meaning loser. To describe the word as being 'Scots' is however misleading. True it appears in the Dictionary of the Older Scots Tongue, but 'tyne' etc is acknowledged both there and in the OED as being 'Middle English'. Cassandra.
Killed or 'being the death of?
Paul Barlow's amendment, changing 'being the death of
Edmund Stafford, 5th Earl of Stafford' to 'killed' changes the meaning. Did Archibald kill Edmund - or cause his death?
Shipsview (
talk) 21:08, 4 July 2011 (UTC)reply
Lieutenant-general??
'Douglas was given the post of '
Lieutenant-General in the waging of war through all the Kingdom of France.' Surely this title Lieutenant General of France in the middle ages signified a rank comparing to head of the army rather than the modern army rank of a lieutenant-general. Suggest pipe link be removed. --
Bill Reid | (
talk) 13:37, 9 September 2011 (UTC)reply
See here:
[1]. Think rather the article on Lieutenant General needs to be improved! Various of the Douglases and others were also "Lieutenant" of the Kingdom of Scots, a considerably higher rank than the contemporary military usage.
Brendandh (
talk) 15:15, 9 September 2011 (UTC)reply
Daughters
The recently added Marjory should be Mary, I think. Mary Douglas (b c1390) "elder legitimate daughter"? m. (1406-7) Sir Simon Glendonwyn of Glendonwyn (b c1378, d 1437) ('Stirnet' & 'thepeerage')
Shipsview (
talk) 15:12, 15 December 2017 (UTC)reply