This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Tunisia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tunisia, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Tunisia. For more information, visit the project page.TunisiaWikipedia:WikiProject TunisiaTemplate:WikiProject TunisiaTunisia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Archaeology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Greece: Byzantine This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Byzantine world task force.

A WP search for "Sufetula" must redirect automatically here. Who can do it? Arminden Arminden ( talk) 11:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC) reply

It is common on WP and generally in any encyclopaedia to set the main term first, so

• Sufetula (archaeological site), or if you insist
• Sbeitla (archaeological site), with "Sufetula" redirecting here.
  

It is not a matter of national pride to insist on the modern name, people come to WP to find explanations, and they use the search terms most familiar to them. See Petra, not Al-Batra, Ephesus, not Efes, Alexandria, not Eskenderiya. Thanks, Arminden Arminden ( talk) 11:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC) reply