This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Antihydrogen article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
A news item involving Antihydrogen was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 21 December 2016. |
What would the expected consequences of an antihydrogen fusion reaction be ? Is it possible ? Would the effects be similar to hydrogen fusion with the exception of the creation of antihelium instead, or would it be expected to behave differently ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.116.128.56 ( talk) 20:02, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Antihydrogen fusion exists now created by lightning. Relativistic Perturbation Mantle is the name for this. A new discovery in Lightning physics that revealed the very centerpiece in the reproduction cycle for many things in the universe...Dark matter producing Dark energy and earths biosphere... "Relativistic Perturbation "Mantle" www.rpmantle.com
When hydrogen sits at an high altitude weightless environment of lightning, it creates a disc of antihydrogen fusion. In the construction process this fusion creates rings of Carbon, Liquid oxygen cooling the fusion back to carbon sealing and surrounding a 2 dimensional 12 foot disc of fused negative energy (anti-hydrogen fusion). This combination traps the energy allowing for the conversion of the first carbon ring to high energy photons "dark energy" still producing high energy photons in the configuration of the Fibonacci sequence and then disappears "dark matter" only to reappear (as seen on NASA video) when the fusion is cooled back to our dimension as a Sprite. This is known as the Fibonacci sequence for all life. When Mantle consumes the first carbon ring it allows the paramagnetic Liquid Oxygen to rush in producing Sprite's above storms. This witnessed event is documented and by current sciences. Mantle for short produces Gamma rays found by NASA's FERMI satellite during Sprite production. PAMELA satellite found the anti-protons around the Van Allen belt produced by Mantle's energetics discharge. Mantle's reproduction will lend efforts to traveling as dark energy exceeding light speed "Warp" travel, wormhole production and dimension technology. The release of charged liquid Oxygen is converting to Air/water for the atmosphere and electrons for the Ionosphere. I want to reproduce this energy placing the devices at farms to make water firsthand selling energy making food free eliminating welfare. fulely — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fulely ( talk • contribs) 12:11, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
On the AntiMatter page it says this was made already in 1995 ! Doesn't it say here 2002 ? Which is correct? Sebastian Haase
After some searching, i've found out the Particle accelerator are constructed as we speak, and estimated to be finished in 2q of 2007 -- 80.202.208.62 21:57, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
This source [1] says Fermi also generated antihydrogen, and credits a SLAC researcher, Charles Munger, with coming up with the approach used to find antihydrogen.
Is it just me, or does source 3 only describe a potential method for trapping low temperature anit-protons, and does not actually report it having been achieved? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.61.176 ( talk) 22:37, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
... as h-bar. Do we have a reference for this? It seems strange that a species of interest only to physicists would be given a name which could easily be confused with the reduced Planck constant. Brammers ( talk) 16:57, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- all journal articles that use a symbol use H-bar - written as H with an overline - so it's really not much of a debate. I've updated this in the entry - there is no ambiguity Planck's constant is allways lower-case h ( massen ( talk) 08:25, 5 October 2010 (UTC))
A potential solution to this problem would be to produce antihydrogen atoms at such a low temperature (perhaps a fraction of a kelvin) that they can be captured in a magnetic trap or a combined rf trap.
I removed the above text, and its hidden html comment, as it simply told the reader nothing. It was the equivalent of: Problem is AH is too hot; solution is make AH not so hot. That is not a solution. - 84user ( talk) 18:02, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
and is it ever going to be? I feel like that's saying that nuclear bombs are not available for purchase or that the washington monument is not available for purchase. I would think that that section should be removed. Sompm ( talk) 07:11, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature09610.html ... needs updating. -- Kslotte ( talk) 22:33, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
What is it please tell me. 163.153.221.61 ( talk) 15:33, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Antihydrogen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:48, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
It strikes me that a direct scaling up may give readers a slightly wrong impression: no doubt antihydrogen would cost less per gram if we could actually make a whole gram. Double sharp ( talk) 10:36, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
(A redux from
here and
here, I suppose.)
I should have brought this up earlier. I suppose it's really a character encoding issue. It seems that Macs can't see the bar of the h-bar symbol. At the very start it looks just like "(H)". The best I can find using a MacBook is as code (
) on this Element template, but the normal text doesn't render properly. Can anyone using a Mac confirm this? Is this issue specific to my system? -
Thibbs (
talk) 14:45, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
H
I mean, it's an atom, right? Given that hydrogen's atomic number is 1, shouldn't it follow that antihydrogen's atomic number would be -1? 2001:56A:F8E1:E00:51FA:1690:29B9:9A88 ( talk) 02:56, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
OK, seriously: if an antiproton were just a negative proton, then if you had both a proton and an antiproton, then you would have nothing. But you don't yet. See protonium: it lasts for some time as a bound state before annihilating. Double sharp ( talk) 12:06, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
But, to be conpletely fair with you, I'd never heard of an antineutron before this discussion, so I'm obviously not an expert, just toying around. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:56A:F8E1:E00:2D98:4E43:D131:9A62 ( talk) 01:07, 27 March 2023 (UTC)