This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Please explain your rationale for using these tags on the talk pages when adding tags to articles. [1]-- Propastop ( talk) 11:31, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Why was the mentioning of the 1923 Great Kanto Earthquake removed from the introduction? This was an incident where, accused of poisoning wells and looting, ethnic Koreans were massacred in Japan, which was highly xenophobic at that time. Additionally, why has all mentioning of nationalism been removed? Certainly nationalism plays a large role in anti-Korean sentiment. -- 李博杰 | — Talk contribs 12:42, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
This article is aimed for the "discrimination infobox template", since there was no article for Korea, yet there is racism present against Korea. This page is based on the format of the Anti-Japanese sentiment page. Large amount of info taken from Chinese Wiki article regarding Anti-Korean sentiment. More info, examples, links and sources will be added soon. -- 李博杰 | — Talk contribs 05:02, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Clearly this whole article is korean propaganda. 99% of the sources are korean, and some don't even have links. Opinions from single sources are also presented as mainstream. This is representative of typical korean edits in Wikipedia as the koreans try to convince the world of their view point as the correct one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.100.35 ( talk) 04:24, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
second. this article is clearly korean's pov.-peter —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.120.182.30 ( talk) 02:15, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Can anyone tell me the origin of the Confucius claim? A youtube video does not suffice to show that claim.
My local newspaper says that it originated from a hoax article.
http://www.todayonline.com/articles/270518.asp
Also, where is the origin of claim that Korean claims that Hanzi was a Korean invention? Can anyone prove it and cite some sources for us to see?
HistoryManiac (
talk)
16:39, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
in fact, 高丽棒子 and 韓棒子 refer the same term. The reason why the Korean is referred as 棒子 (bàng zǐ) by many of the Chinese people is, as explained in many of the online forums, that during the Japanese invasion into North-eastern region of China (during World War II), Korean soldiers constitute the second part of the invasion forces, under the control of the Japanese Army. This is actually why the Japanese was referred as "鬼子" (devils) and the Korean being 二鬼子"second devils". However, the Korean soldiers were not equipped with weapons by the Japanese. Instead, the Koreans themselves picked up clubs "棒子" to beat the native Chinese people. This is reason why they were also referred as 棒子"club". This is what I understand from reading the online forums. You mentioned the term how the Korean was called by Chinese people but do not make sufficient explanation. In fact, nowadays in China, almost no one call the Korean "clubs". Instead, the youth Chinese are open to current Korean culture and fashion, and it does become popular as a major fashion in China between the youth.
I post these comment to avoid a negative impression of the Chinese being made. In fact, the Chinese people are far from raciest and those terms mentioned above were produced under historical reasons.
reduce POV word. also there is no evidecne all korean claim same. 222.106.188.74 ( talk) 05:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
The Korean invaded China with Imperial Japanese Army. And Korean with the club caused Chinese.So Chinese call Korean 高丽棒子.
The Korean invaded China with Imperial Japanese Army. The Korean was a Japanese subordinate.So Chinese call Japanese 日鬼子(Jpanese devils).AND Chinese called Korean 二鬼子(2ND DEVILS).
The source mentioned above
日本が韓半島を侵奪した後、満州を経て中国を本格的に占領する時期のことと関連があるようだ。 日本の手先として、棒を持って横行しながら中国人を苦しめた韓国人ということだ 中国人が当時、自国を侵略した日本人には「日鬼子」、その手先だった一部の韓国人には「二(2番目の)鬼子」という称号を付けた。 【噴水台】高麗棒2008.08.28 JoongAng Ilbo(Japanese)
下面的说法似乎更有说服力,即日本在吞并韩半岛之后,通过满洲地区向中国发动侵略,而部分韩国人(当时国号为“大韩帝国”)则作为日本的傀儡手里拿着棍棒欺负中国人。中国人当时把日本侵略军称为“日本鬼子”,把日本的傀儡——韩国人称为“二鬼子”。考虑到这一点,我们可以认为“高丽棒子”的词源与其是有一定关联的。 韩国中央日报:高丽棒2008.08.28 JoongAng Ilbo(Chinese) -- Propastop ( talk) 13:06, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
This article has some pretty dumb things written in. 朝鮮人 is Korean, and not even necessarily North. It is not derogotory in ANY ways what-so-ever, and either is 韩国. That part is deleted.
This article is low quality and rootless.It should be removed. -reader of "대쥬신제국사" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.120.182.30 ( talk) 02:16, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Another important trigger of anti-korean sentiment blast in China is the inhumanity reply swamped in korean internet chat-room during earthquake in southwest china. Some korean's reply literally translates to 'pigs deserve to die'. Similar internet racist also happened when there was a train accident in southern china and some people died. Also the discrimination against chinese ethnic korean is a big cause too. In which it has been reportly many cases that chinese korean women were raped or killed in korean while korean government takes no solid action to resolve the hatred between chinese korean and south korean and between north korean and south korean. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.120.182.30 ( talk) 02:24, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
the author sounds like anti-korean sentiment is directed or caused by the chinese communist party, which is actually another general category of discrimination towards chinese in korean (chinese are communists). Trying to connect anti-korean sentiment with soccer makes this article a child's play. Actually not a lot of chinese watch soccer in china. And when it comes to anti-korean sentiment, mainland china (communist china) is not at the same scale comparing to taiwan.-kevin
this article is seriously bias towards korean POV. The statement of involvement of chinese government to play down korean soccer team makes this article a joke that is not even funny. As a biggest reasons of anti-korean sentiment in china, racisim towards chinese people in south korea is the root and fundmental cause. And some south Korean's behavior such as looting, looking down to chinese people has contributed to the result too. The writer also missed an important point that there are quite a lot of korean historians who like to make funny assumption of history and make false historical claims which could potentially cause political issue and result in hatred between both side. Why korean is disliked by both Chinese and Japanese? either both chinese and japanese are stupid and ignorant of 'lovely' korean culture, or korean culture is not so lovely. It doesn't take a phd in history to figure it out.- datz
wow, just wow. Reading this article makes it seem like the Chinese are a bunch of uncivilized, petty, jealous, ignoramuses with a huge inferiority complex. Clearly some of the issues are presented somewhat one sided, but does an encyclopedia really need so much details on every incident of anti-korean sentiments? Alot of the issues could be summed up in one or two sentences. -anon
I've protected this page so that this edit war can be resolved on the talk page. Cherry Blossom OK ( talk · contribs) and Benlisquare ( talk · contribs) are both way over 3RR and pushing WP:CIVIL to the limit. Please sort this out on here rather than edit warring. Thanks. -- Ged UK 13:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}} There is a broken reference in this article. Even is the outcome of the discussion will be to remove it, it shouldn't be broken. <ref name=rjk>[http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/08/28/more-on-anti-korean-sentiment-in-china/ More on Anti-Korean Sentiment in China]</ref> I found the fix on this diff
Just to stay on the safe side: I did this in view of my regular work on verious error categories. Debresser ( talk) 09:55, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. BTW, the {{pp-semi-indef|small=yes|expiry=December 25, 2008}}
template in this article is also a little outdated and waiting to be removed.
Debresser (
talk)
11:04, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Wow, did I write that?! A classical example of some stylistic mistake or the other. Debresser ( talk) 11:05, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Admins, this article should be indef semi-protect, it receives a large number of unconstructive edits from IPs, especially socks. -- 李博杰 | — Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 03:07, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
KOREANS ALWAYS HAVE VIEWED TAIWANESE/TAIWAN AS " BACKSTABBERS" AND " BROWN NOSER TO JAPAN". KOREANS/KOREA WILL NEVER SUPPORT TAIWAN IN UNITED NATION. IT DOES NOT MATTER IF KOREANS VIEW CHINA OR TAIWAN WHOMEVER IS CHINESE. KOREANS NEVER TRUSTED TAIWANESE. OVERSEAS CHINESE IN KOREA NEVER PAYED TAX TO KOREAN GOVERNMENT AND THEY HAVE POLITICALLY ALLY THEMSELVES WITH COMMUNIST CHINA OR MILITARY JAPAN. KOREANS HAVE HISTORY NOT TO LIKE TAIWANESE OR CHINESE AS A WHOLE CULTURAL GROUP. 1970 PRESIDENT " PARK CHUNG HEE" AS NATIONAL SYMBOL OF DISTRUST OF CHINESE. HE DESTROYED CHINATOWN IN KOREA. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boston1Joker ( talk • contribs) 05:51, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Anti-korean sentiment is mostly caused by the distrust of korean people, dislike of korean food. Korean nationalists have also greatly troubled both pro-blue and pro-green taiwan people. Korean historians culture 'pilgrim' such as 'chiwoo','Gangneung Danoje Festival','traditional chinese medican' deepened the distrust. In 1980s, when south korea abandoned diplomatic relationship with taiwan and establish full scale relationship with PRC, a hurt feeling has rooted pro-green taiwan people ever since, which is another major source of anti-korean sentiment in taiwan.
source:
http://briandeutsch.blogspot.com/2008/07/anti-korean-sentiment-in-taiwan.html
Kevindatz (
talk)
03:29, 25 March 2009 (UTC)kevin
I remove original research.
It sure looks like the latter was something that actually happened: [5]
It seems the LAPD has got their act together and patting themselves on the back since though: [6] Munci ( talk) 15:32, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
In case you didn't get the message (as possibly seen by your previous edits, yet again of the same problem), Please learn how to use proper Wiki syntax, to prevent any corruption in the page. Also, if you have any contributions to make, please provide detailed explanations, as well as sources backing up your argument. Your IP, 71.177.27.12, appears to be from Temecula, California, United States, under the ISP of Verizon. Unfortunately Wikipedia does not accept first-hand accounts, as per WP:OR, and so you still will need to provide credible sources for your edits. -- 李博杰 | — Talk contribs email 07:43, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
The first draft of the Japan section is almost complete. Should be ready by the 10th of April. -- 李博杰 | — Talk contribs 04:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
After china's sichuan earthquake happened during May 2008, korean internet chat-room had been swamped by huge amount of racist replies. Some replies are far beyond the level of racism and inhumanity. i.e. http://img.qbar.qq.com/cgi-bin/img?uuid=__bd6c34b5bba048a7a30720b7ea87581f English tranlation: All chinese are dogs(note: dog is a derogative term in korean). They all deserve to die. Please keep the earthquake going, kill them all. And all minority in china can declare independence.
http://img.qbar.qq.com/cgi-bin/img?uuid=__e2a5873097b84aca9d8d74daa17853af English translation: The earthquake is a dharma to chinese pride (their bad doing). Tibet should be seperated from china right away.
http://img.qbar.qq.com/cgi-bin/img?uuid=__83dffce41dbf4d6b8d1ff9035f30cca5 English translation: It's too sad there is only 10 thousand chinese died. There should be more, like 100 thousand. It's still too few if 100,000 of them died. Those chinese dog (deserve to die). There should be chinese dead body everywhere on the street. It's racist though, but chinese are the low race of east asia (so they should all die).
These are only some examples of inhuman replies in korean internet chat-room. The discrimination against chinese in korean society is beyond full scale, which caused the anti-korean sentiment from the chinese side. Kevindatz ( talk) 03:16, 25 March 2009 (UTC)kevin
There are obvious problems with this section. It is pathetically written with no viable sources as well as subjective and outdated contents. The first source [1] takes material from a site that is nothing more than a blog. The second source [2] refers to an online poll which was conducted five years ago. And there is no supporting references whatsoever for all these entwining bold statements such as: "such attitudes can be seen as a simple annoyance rather than absolute hatred, and do not represent any political, historical or social implications therein", "Although general dislike for Korea is rather low". This is not acceptable and will be deleted immediately. Pds0101 ( talk) 11:40, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
THE SLUR "GOOK" WAS USED IN AMERICAN-PHILLIPINE WAR/ VIETNAM WAR. GOOK DESCRIBES PHILLIPINOES NOT KOREANS.!!!!! UPDATE THE FACT PLEASE. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boston1Joker ( talk • contribs) 05:53, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Some Korean invaded China with Imperial Japanese Army. Korean want to hide this FACT. BUT THIS IS THE FACT.THIS EDIT IS KOREAN POINT OF VIEW .. [8] -- Propastop ( talk) 14:29, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
There's questionable credibility of this article, specially there's no logic behind, article author is well-known Anti-Korean himself. The article should be re-written in more neutral pov but instead, it added unnecessary elements. Such Anti-Korean sentiments only exists in PRC, Taiwan and Japan. Other country's Anti-Korean sentiments are divided into North and South Korea. -- KSentry( talk) 12:05, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
This article is obviously written by Koreans who embrace and relish their "victim status" throughout history and use it as an excuse at times to be assholes. That's their reputation anyway. But besides that, there must be a difference between anti-Korean sentiment that is valid (IE: they come to mongolia, herd up women, put them in clubs and then bring in pasty old Korean businessmen to use them for sex). That is when Koreans are criticized legitimately. But Koreans like to turn every outside criticism of their group into another form of victimization. For god's sake, enough is enough. No one disputes that the Japanese occupation was horrible. But the Jews had it much worse, and they (ME!) have moved on. It's time for Koreans to do the same for God's sake. please.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.36.208.67 ( talk • contribs)
I'm currently writing a seminar paper on Japanese-Korean relations and came across a few instances in the article which are marked as "citation-needed" which I think I can reference with academic literature I found during my research. clem ( talk) 22:40, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
(U.S. military slang) [Gook is] a derogatory term for all Asians
— gook
As cited from the article, gook apparently means "a derogatory term for all Asians". Don't you think that is quite inaccurate? I mean the term "Asian" even includes the people of Pakistani/Indian origins. ItsAlwaysLupus ( talk) 05:24, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
The statement that "Bakachon-camera" meaning "stupid Korean" and being an example of discrimination is a false and slanderous exaggeration of Japanese prejudices. "Chon" did not mean "Korean person", it meant "idiot" at the time the word was mostly used, therefore terms like "baka-chon camera" have nothing to do with racism. (The term has meant "idiot" or "boring person" since the Edo Era, and has become use primarily as an ethnic slur very recently.)
Suggest deletion.
- Yodelingman — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.179.97.31 ( talk) 13:37, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
[13] [14] There is not clear that between chon with Korean. -- Fc57zj ( talk) 18:42, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
I have check the article of 2010 BBC Poll, and seems like it has little to do with anti-Korean sentiment in each country. The survey is more about positive vs negative influences of a country on global politics and vaguely related to anti-sentiment toward a country of interest. To be more objective, the table should be provided as a whole, not just negative views. Moreover, this article is about anti-sentiment towards South and/or North Korea and only shows a table for South Korea. In the original BBC article, it has surveys for both South and North Korea. PBJT ( talk) 18:26, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Done PBJT ( talk) 20:55, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
There is no clear reason to place Taiwan and the PRC under one section, seeing as the PRC section contains ROC info and should be converted to a "China" section if needed. Not to mention the use of the term Greater China is extremely rare, much less neutral when in a political context. Taiwan seems to be a different entity here. A much more neutral arrangement would be to have all the Asian countries under one "In Asia" section if certain people (for some reason, and definitely not because of a biased POV) feel compelled to have Taiwan and China under the same section.
The only reasonable excuse to have Taiwan and China under one "Greater China" section is if both entities had the same reasons or examples for their respective anti-Korean sentiment. I do not see that. Especially since the PRC section contains historical background dating back to 1910. Taiwan's section, on the other hand, focuses on the island (group) itself, either in modern history or the ROC regime on Taiwan. Placing the two under one section is not only unnecessary but also misleading.-- 111.249.188.14 ( talk) 11:06, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
I had to remove the claims made modern day anti-korean settlement in Japan since is feels far too much focused on nitpicking and sterotyping how the Japanese view Korean people rather than creating an unbiased perspective of information. If someone does manage to create a bunch of referances that are based on realism that please do, but untill than that long, long list I removed felt more like a method of enforcing Japanese sterotypes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Graylandertagger ( talk • contribs) 02:50, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
In that case, i'd advise dicussing the concept of triming the Japan section down just to cite examples as the list is far too long and as a resault gives people who visit it the wrong idea that most people Japan are like that. It's rather an unfair and irresponsible way of explaining the situation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Graylandertagger ( talk • contribs) 16:21, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
I'm not saying that there is no issues with regard to hatred toward Korea. I just feel that the way the Japan section is write isn't responsible. That being said I guess rewriting it in a manner to point out the modern issues in a few paragraphs so that it doesn't feel like a list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Graylandertagger ( talk • contribs) 20:42, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
3 main reasons for anti-Korean sentiment there.
1. Sports: Taekwondo, baseball, and basketball, in that order. Taiwanese and Chinese sports fans have a deeply ingrained stereotype of Korean athletes and more importantly Korean referees as willing to cheat to win. Case in point is the 2009 East Asian Games, when a male South Korean taekwondo athlete hit the Taiwanese athlete in the neck 17 seconds into the match in the men's final, resulting in the Taiwanese athlete been immediately rushed to the hospital and Korean athlete declared the winner, despite Taiwanese delegation's protests. I don't know if the stereotype is justified, but I know it's there.
- also, I am no baseball fan but I know using the word 'never' is very dangerous in serious literature. It's factually inaccurate to say that the Taiwanese baseball never once defeated the South Korean team (e.g. 2003 Asian Baseball Championship), though the Koreans do prevail most of the time.
2. Politics: Given that Taiwan and South Korea were good buddies during the Cold War, Taiwanese were infuriated when in 1992 South Korean government switched recognition from Republic of China (Taiwan) to the People's Republic of China (communist China). It was otherwise understandable ('coz every other country was switching anyways) except that the South Korean government forcibly expelled Taiwanese diplomats and transferred all Taiwanese embassy and consular assets in Korea over to China with virtually no prior notice, so Taiwan felt robbed -- at least give them a few weeks or something to move out and sell their stuff first. That kind of ruthlessness ain't no way to treat an old friend. This helped develop the stereotype of Koreans as underhanded cheaters in the sports arena mentioned above.
3. Historical controversies: Yes, a lot of the news on Koreans claiming various (hitherto considered Chinese) cultural heritage as in fact Korean made both Chinese and Taiwanese felt Koreans were 'cultural thieves'. Many false rumors also add to the distrust even though they were later proved fake. Again, the stereotype of Koreans as underhanded cheaters persists. Donquixotean ( talk) 02:58, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
Removed the sentence
Anti-communist propaganda in the United States, as well as allied countries such as South Korea.
In addition to not making grammatical sense it also implies that the negative perception of north korea is from "propaganda" not it's well documented human rights abuses and incredibly low standard of living compared to South Korea. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Getnow ( talk • contribs) 06:46, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Getnow ( talk) 15:27, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Anti-Korean sentiment. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 06:00, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Anti-Korean sentiment. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:50, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Anti-Korean sentiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:21, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
There should probably be a citation needed for the Tagalog section. Not only is it hyperbolic, it is written from a very biased standpoint not matter of the fact in a neutral manner such as the other nations derogatory terms. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biznizz ( talk • contribs) 16:03, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
User:Daiichi1 is trying to revert to add unsourced content in the article without discussion. Started this discussion to reach conclusion in a peaceful way without more edit warring.
Dear
User:Daiichi1, what is your reason and evidence to add the category 'Discrimination in Taiwan' in this article?
Npovobsessed (
talk)
03:54, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
I think it has some incorrect, or wrong places.It's written as if Japanese massacred innocent Koreans.But in fact,There were many Korean criminals -Raping little girls,Arson,Shooting people, and Japanese people organized vigilante groups to defense themselves. Partial people had persecuted Koreans.But Japanese government had decided to dispatch Imperial army to guard Korean,stop persecute. Finally, This situation was saved. I think this section seems to need some revision. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drunk katzen ( talk • contribs) 16:08, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Drunk katzen ( talk • contribs) 02:14, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Quote: "Anti-Korean sentiment involves hatred or dislike for Korean people, culture or either of the two states (North Korea/South Korea) on the Korean peninsula."
"Either state" includes both North and South Korea. Sentiment against the DPRK is also anti-Korean sentiment. -- 李博杰 | — Talk contribs 02:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
[17] check old news of china. cleary, before 2006, 二鬼子 is not refer to korea. however, Chinese internet user changed word meaning, since 2006. 222.106.188.74 ( talk) 05:14, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Check plublic trusted chinese dictionary,
◎ 二鬼子 èrguǐzi
[traitor] 抗战中蔑称汉奸卖国贼
二鬼子 mean traitor, not korean. But Chinese made fabrication that this word refer to korean. Wikipedia can't accept fake and hoax and original research. 222.106.188.74 ( talk) 05:21, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Confucius was Korean [6], that Hanzi was a Korean invention, and that the holiday of May 5th is a Korean tradition
I was educated in South Korea, and have never learned that Confucius was Korea, or that Hanzi is a Korean invention. Heck, I don't even know what "Hanzi" is. And ask anyone in South Korea; we are all well educated - we will tell you that Confucius is Chinese, and (vehemently) deny that he is Korean; he is Chinese as we are taught, and we know. You sound like a product of some anti-Korean propaganda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.183.137.146 ( talk) 04:50, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
https://academy3.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/china/1113386581/?v=pc It's too large of a forum to scroll into, so I suggest you search for the word "Confuscius" in this article. In addition, I do not read Japanese, and I therefore had to rely on the browser translate device, but I think it was good enough to get the general gist of it. Edward hahm ( talk) 07:40, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
“韩国人说孔子和老子是韩国人”和“甚至把释迦牟尼也说成是韩国人”……这类报道一出,当然会激起华人年轻网民的愤怒。“干脆连希特勒、墨索里尼和本拉登也说成是韩国人吧”之类的讥讽言语也向韩国人迎面扑来。韩国人闻所未闻的内容在台湾媒体上被歪曲得好像真的一样,成为批判和讽刺韩国的工具。从韩国人的角度上看,没有比这更冤枉的事了。"Chinese fabrication that korean claims that Confucius was Korean? .... etc... was korean? Korea never heard it before. this absurd claim made by Chinese. " Korea newspaper chosunilbo 222.106.188.74 ( talk) 05:26, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
二鬼子 [èrguǐzi] 1. noun A disparaging designation of puppet armies and traitors during the Anti-Japanese War. 他在抗日战争时期当过二鬼子。 He was a traitor during the Anti-Japanese War.
Originally, 二鬼子 word not refer to Korean. but chinese internet user hate korean, so they made "new" definition. also it is a fake meaning. 222.106.188.74 ( talk) 05:31, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
The Korean invaded China with Imperial Japanese Army. And Korean with the club caused Chinese.So Chinese call Korean 高丽棒子.
The Korean invaded China with Imperial Japanese Army. The Korean was a Japanese subordinate.So Chinese call Japanese 日鬼子(Jpanese devils).AND Chinese called Korean 二鬼子(2ND DEVILS).
The source mentioned above
日本が韓半島を侵奪した後、満州を経て中国を本格的に占領する時期のことと関連があるようだ。 日本の手先として、棒を持って横行しながら中国人を苦しめた韓国人ということだ 中国人が当時、自国を侵略した日本人には「日鬼子」、その手先だった一部の韓国人には「二(2番目の)鬼子」という称号を付けた。 【噴水台】高麗棒2008.08.28 JoongAng Ilbo(Japanese)
下面的说法似乎更有说服力,即日本在吞并韩半岛之后,通过满洲地区向中国发动侵略,而部分韩国人(当时国号为“大韩帝国”)则作为日本的傀儡手里拿着棍棒欺负中国人。中国人当时把日本侵略军称为“日本鬼子”,把日本的傀儡——韩国人称为“二鬼子”。考虑到这一点,我们可以认为“高丽棒子”的词源与其是有一定关联的。 韩国中央日报:高丽棒2008.08.28 JoongAng Ilbo(Chinese)-- Propastop ( talk) 13:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 January 2021 and 7 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Slapell.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 14:26, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi,
I added the unbalanced template to the within Korea section. It could benefit from more info on how North Korea treats various groups. toobigtokale ( talk) 05:54, 15 May 2023 (UTC)