I have come across a great shrine to Amy Sorel. I added in confusion, and wonderd if it would be approved to be listed with the others. the website url is http://www.freewebs.com/amy_sorel Also, i would like to add that the Adorned website is not working properly. I thought that stating that it is currently not working or having it removed would be wise. Leaving it up would be good too. I thank you for your time.
Sincerly, Amy Fan
I am the owner of the site. i would love if the site could be listed. i have tons of images and things. If any more information is needed then comment or whatever here.-- 70.16.81.212 08:08, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
I don't get this sentence "She was bitten the words from those days and smiled." Cleo 23:12, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Is her fighting style more original in the arcade version to differenciate her from the custom characters? Cheers! 01lander 11:27, May 2007 (UTC)
On the official website, Amy's age is listed as "unknown." (And, from her appearance, I'd say she looks closer to 14 or 15 anyway, but that is entirely subjective.) ~~~~A Pedantic Editer
Amy was never officially said to be named "Amy Sorel". Her name is only listed as "Amy" on the official sites, even though other characters have their full names. And really, while Raphael did "adopt" her, I kinda doubt he did all the paperwork (not to mention he's probably not fond of his own family name by now, so I wouldn't assume he gave it to Amy). I think the page should be renamed and edited accordingly. 88.161.129.43 ( talk) 11:49, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Image:LaAmy 004.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:42, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Image:Amy's Costumes.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 21:27, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Though Amy's birthdate is not well-known, it is safe to say that she was not born after the French Revolution. Thus, this precludes her from ever being born in any French Empire in the first place. If I recall, during that time France was undergoing succession wars with England, and/or crushing Huguenots. -- 68.50.163.116 ( talk) 01:40, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure how video games are considered as sources for references, but with video game characters, they're pretty much the best source aside official websites in my opinion. So now there's references in the article, and everybody should be happy.
As for the in-universe stuff, I honestly don't know what else people can do to make the article more out-of-universe (except maybe putting "in the fictional world of this videogame" into every sentence). Really, it says "video game" and "fictional" everywhere in the article already, and it would only take a complete retard to mistake this as an article of a real person.
So enough with the tags, please. Especially if you're just tagging for the fun of it and not trying to improve the article yourself. SamSandy ( talk) 19:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
I think people are demanding too much from these videogame articles, and following the Wikipedia guidelines too blindly. I'll be damned if anybody can find researches or scientific on these characters, so can people please stop demanding such sources?
Questioning notability of these articles is downright silly, since were talking about main characters with enough information about them to merit an article. This is not an article about the third Goomba Mario encounters in Super Mario Bros, Amy and the others are fleshed-out characters with backgrounds, various artworks and appearances, uniqueness and such to verify their notability.
The guidelines of this site can't apply to every article indiscriminately, we have to use our common sense as well. The majority of both readers and writers want articles about video games here, so there should damn well be room for them here too. It's just impossible that they'd be as well written or well sourced as the many scientific articles. So get real. SamSandy ( talk) 19:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Okay, this is pretty much just like the old character analysis section from before. I'm removing these for the same reason people from before deleted the character analysis section. If you want to find out why, check out Taki's and Kilik's talk pages. Mythmonster2 ( talk) 06:03, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
One gameplay video shows Amy as the 1P character vs. Siegfried. I noticed she's not anymore saying the one only word "Amy", instead she also says "Get lost" and probably some other words? I'd hope to see these additions in the future.-- JCD ( Talk) 10:52, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
I listened to that video extra carefully, I heard her say "Get lost", but I also thought I heard her say "Got It!" a few seconds before she said "get lost"
That's pretty good to hear. Now we know that Amy is more verbal now and she's bad... Joke haha. Well, let's just wait what else she would say in the game now that she's a main character this time.-- JCD ( Talk) 10:08, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Who keeps adding Raphael and Amy as fictional vampires??? It is popular in fan-content, but there is absolutely no evidence of it being canon. Whoever is adding it better have some good evidence or I'll continue removing them. Mythmonster2 ( talk) 18:45, 20 July 2008 (UTC) (Sorry, I forgot to log in)
Um...well, in Raphael's Critical Finish, he bites the opponent's neck...greedily. He then says he considers making them Amy's pet. ♥, Ivyluv ( talk) 16:32, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
In the weapon section, should we even mention something about it? And the British reference, it should not be detailed much further. Since those things wasn't even mentioned in any of the game however.-- JCD ( Talk) 15:35, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
I realize that a number of other Soul Calibur character pages are undergoing the same issue, but some aren't. The Critical Finisher descriptions should not be included in Wikipedia content describing a character. It is a gameplay detail that is out-of-scope of Wikipedia. Furthermore, I am not certain the appearance of the Critical Finisher even has any effect on how it works, gameplay-wise. These repeat additions by various user(s) seem childish, at least to me. It is akin to trying to add something 'cool' to Wikipedia, not something helpful to others. Similar actions might include trying to add descriptions of other personal favorite moves of a character, such as 'cool' unblockables or the like. That sort of information is not for Wikipedia. WikiPorc ( talk) 00:26, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Well, right now, the articles are a complete mess, with wildly varying orders and etc. Before we think about removing these, they need to be organized and then we should start discussing it. Mythmonster2 ( talk) 23:09, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Amy didn't had any "joke" weapon to be specific. She uses the weapon set of the Rapier style of Character creation although, it doesn't have a "joke" weapon in it.-- JCD ( Talk) 09:43, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
It seems we have more resources now. And since Amy, is already a mainstream character, an article wouldn't be that bad afterall. Plus wikipedia isn't complaining ;).-- JCD ( Talk) 12:18, 23 August 2008 (UTC)