This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Amphibious assault ship article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Amphibious assault ship. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Amphibious assault ship at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
@ BilCat: Why do this as a revert? You could've just removed the types from the bottom, like you did at the lead. Instead you've also undone the improvements and fixes I made to the remaining list. Are you going revert them back? Or fix them all manually yourself? - theWOLFchild 11:57, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
I didn't think they were improvements, I figured by "they", you meant the LPDs, LSDs & LSLs you removed. But now you say
"they" referred to the Dokdo LPHs, which you added. I don't follow. As for the dates, that's my bad, I thought it was 2015. Anyway, I did't know about this dispute, but basically I take it consensus was in favour of having this article focus solely on the full deck amphibs? And others, such as LPD & LSD, should not be included? But some IP user kept adding them anyway, is that the gist of it? It doesn't really matter to me either way, but is there to be no mention at all of these other types of amphibs, even if just to distinguish them from the full-deck types? - theWOLFchild 19:25, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Juan Carlos is the ship that affected Anadolu and Canberra, because USS Iwo Jima should be replaced with Juan Carlos. Nimitz0vikrant ( talk) 09:07, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
@ Nimitz0vikrant: you keep making changes to images on this and other naval ship related pages, changes that are often not needed, not improvements, full of errors, and require the time and attention of other editors to fix. This is not the first time this issue has been raised with you, nor am I the only editor to do so. Going forward, I would suggest you propose your changes on the talk page first, so that other editors can assist you. This will help reduce the disruption caused by your edits, while you learn how and when to make such changes. Thank you - wolf 08:22, 4 May 2023 (UTC)