This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Latter Day Saint movement Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

I've moved the article back to the Ammonites (Book of Mormon) page. It had been moved to the Anti-Nephi-Lehi page because that is the name the Anti-Nephi-Lehis chose for themselves. While this is true, the Wikipedia guidelines indicate that the most common name should be used, partly for success while searching. I feel that Ammonites is the more common usage, but I'm willing to be persuaded.

I did add a disambiguation page for Ammonites since that page was previously a redirect to Ammon (nation)

-- andersonpd 04:04, 3 September 2005 (UTC) reply

This article is redundant with Anti-Nephi-Lehies. Both of them should be wrapped up into Lamanite. Epachamo ( talk) 12:53, 17 April 2020 (UTC) reply

@ Epachamo I don't agree that both the articles should be moved to Lamanite, but I do agree that this one and Anti-Nephi-Lehies should be merged. PeanutHat ( talk) 06:15, 24 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Yeah, I don't agree with my earlier recommendation anymore that they should be wrapped up into the Lamanite article in its current form. Epachamo ( talk) 13:14, 24 May 2020 (UTC) reply