This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
The article does not seem to show why this language should be regarded as in any way "standard" and not just a collection of local varieties. Either this omission needs to be fixed or the content folded in to
American German.--
Pfold (
talk) 08:22, 16 April 2019 (UTC)reply
@
Pfold: The nonsensical page title has been moved in the meanwhile, but the lead is just as dubious as before. I agree to merge the content (provided it is well-sourced) to
German language in the United States (the target page of
American German). German-speaking communities either speak a dynamic continuation of their vernacular dialects which they brought over from German-speaking Europe, or they are oriented towards common Standard German. AFAIK, local variants never have consolidated into a specifically American "standard" variety. –
Austronesier (
talk) 10:54, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
I agree the articles should be merged. — There is one newspaper, Hiwwe wie Driwwe, that is published in a High German variety other than Standard German, and to which "[m]ore than 100 Pennsylvania German authors—members of Lutheran and UCC churches as well as Old Order Amish and Old Order Mennonites—have already contributed pieces of prose, poems and newspaper articles." That may lead to some degree of standardization of Pennsylvania German. Or it may not.
Love —
LiliCharlie (
talk) 12:16, 28 October 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Pfold,
Austronesier, and
LiliCharlie: I've gone ahead and BOLDly redirected this. The article seems to be mostly original research (some of it
seemingly unrelated to the topic entirely) and I can find no support for the term "American German Language" even being used anywhere outside of Wikipedia;
Special:Diff/922678845 seems to confirm that suspicion. The citations used seem to be mostly there to explain existing scholarship that is then critiqued in the article; I don't really think there's anything to merge here.
Blablubbs|
talk 11:38, 25 March 2021 (UTC)reply