This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Everything is cited with press releases. The mover of the day citation was for a quote. I am currently adding more exterior references.
ObtundTalk 00:02, 27 July 2012 (UTC)reply
The problem is that almost every reference given is a press release. These are primary sources and do not help to show notability.
noq (
talk) 08:57, 27 July 2012 (UTC)reply
Half the references are not press releases and secondly look at
GlaxoSmithKline's page they also have executives, every page has them.
ObtundTalk 15:21, 27 July 2012 (UTC)reply
Not every page has them. None of them appear to be notable so why list them? As for the references,
Redorbit is from prnewswire - a press release.
A ref from the company website "Amarin announces" is a press release.
The Reuters one starts Amarin Corp said - sounds like a press release to me.
The Marine3 announcement on the company website is a press release.
Same for the Anchor announcement.
And the last announcement from the company website. So 6 out of 9 are obvious press releases.
noq (
talk) 16:10, 27 July 2012 (UTC)reply
Ehh there are only three.
ObtundTalk 16:19, 27 July 2012 (UTC)reply
I have reformatted the list above to make it clearer and include a count.
noq (
talk) 16:41, 27 July 2012 (UTC)reply
I see you have again removed the tags asserting that there are sufficient references and notability has been shown. Unfortunately as shown above, your references are mostly not reliable so we need better references - so the ref improve tag is certainly relevant. Due to the above problem, notability has not been established and the notability tag is relevant. Having those tags in will help to improve the article as it will attract other editors - removing them without addressing the issues will do nothing to improve the article.
noq (
talk) 08:41, 29 July 2012 (UTC)reply
Notable due to off-label dispute with FDA
if not before. Taking the liberty of removing the notability tag. (I have no COI here) -
Rod57 (
talk) 13:28, 9 March 2016 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Amarin Corporation. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
I’m deleting the line about the “stock soaring in response to”, as it reads like a press release and is not found in other wiki articles about drugs.
Genetikbliss (
talk) 00:51, 18 April 2019 (UTC)reply