This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Albert Pierrepoint is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.
As lead executioner
"From entering the condemned man's cell to opening the trapdoor took him a maximum of 12 seconds." Impressive! Maybe 12 minutes? GreatCaesarsGhost 03:04, 30 March 2019 (UTC)reply
If I remember seven seconds was his record. But he never took more than a minute and usually it was less than thirty seconds. Pierrepoint was a master at his craft. -
Ad Orientem (
talk) 03:08, 30 March 2019 (UTC)reply
This most definitly is not the sortathing you want to be a master at however
RJS001 (
talk) 04:24, 15 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Quite right, Ad Orientem, the record was seven seconds. Pierrepoint considered that if you dallied getting the prisoner bound and made them wait on the scaffold, it was cruel - too much mental torture for them, so he considered that speed and dignity was best. His assistant at the Lord Haw Haw execution remembers that Pierrepoint left his cigar burning while they went to the cell, carried out the execution and returned before any ash had fallen. -
SchroCat (
talk) 11:24, 30 March 2019 (UTC)reply
"Although he may have changed his position after that"
In the fourth paragraph, it says:
"He wrote his memoirs in 1974 in which he concluded that capital punishment was not a deterrent, although he may have changed his position after that."
I mean, of course he might have, but is there a reason to believe he did, granting the inclusion of this sentence? Or is it just someone's opinion?
edit
ok, I saw now the reference to a later interview, I still think that phrasing sounds unclear, perhaps something like "although later statements might suggest a change of position"?
--
Idonthavetimeforthiscarp 18:02, 4 September 2019 (UTC)reply
As it's the lead, it's fine as it is. The detail is in the article, if people want to read. -
SchroCat (
talk) 18:27, 4 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Gravity
"He approached his task with gravity" - very funny, for a hangman, but hardly appropriate. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
118.171.47.88 (
talk) 16:06, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Removed article (unreliable/COI
Hi yes had my link that I say we have the correct number of executions 433 removed (This 433 is not the same 433 that is also mentioned in paragraph) - how do I challenge that it has been removed thanks Matthew Spicer .... — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Matthew Spicer True Crime (
talk •
contribs) 16:29, 15 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The article was removed for a couple of reasons, not least that the magazine does not appear to be of a
WP:RELIABLE standard. You adding it as one of the authors is a bit of a problem with the
WP:COI policy too. As I said on your talk page, as the same figure is also provided by a reliable source, this addition is, in any case, superfluous. -
SchroCat (
talk) 15:34, 15 June 2020 (UTC)reply
OK:) This is far too complicated for me - but thanks for your time:) BTW my 433 is not 'superfluous' as 433 is Albert's total executions, whereas the so-called 'reliable source' has 433 men and 17 women so is incorrect - he actually hanged 433 people including 16 women .... m:) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Matthew Spicer True Crime (
talk •
contribs) 16:41, 15 June 2020 (UTC)reply
As there is some debate over the number by several parties, I don't think any of them can ever actually be deemed to be "complete and accurate". -
SchroCat (
talk) 15:45, 15 June 2020 (UTC)reply
So would it be OK to put our list of 433 on the Wiki page/or linked to the Wiki page with no other comment; and if so, what would the format be .... Matthew:)
No, it wouldn't. As I've said above, the magazine does not appear to be of a
WP:RELIABLE standard. -
SchroCat (
talk) 17:08, 15 June 2020 (UTC)reply